Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 30198
Docket No. MW-29392
94-3-90-3-318
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Charlotte Gold when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO THE DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that
(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier
used outside forces to perform building
remodeling work in the third floor elevator
lobby of the Omaha Headquarters Building on
January 31 through March 8, 1989 (System File
S-168/890471).
(2) The Agreement was further violated when the
Carrier did not give the General Chairman
proper and timely advance written notice of
its intention to contract out the. work
involved here, in accordance with Rule 52 and
the December il, 1981 Letter of Agreement.
(3) As a consequence of the violations referred to
in Parts (1) and/or (2) above, B&B Carpenters
T. E. Danahy and E. C. Sorensen shall each be
allowed two hundred sixteen (216) hours at
their straight time rate of pay."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Form 1 Award No. 30198
Page 2 Docket No. MW-29392
94-3-90-3-318
At issue here is Carrier's decision to subcontract
construction and repair of the third floor elevator lobby of the
Omaha Headquarters Building. The work commenced on January 31,
1989, and was performed by the Linwald Construction Company.
Carrier refers to the work as remodeling. In its Submission, the
organization describes the work as stripping and removing old
ceiling, wallpaper, woodwork, framing new walls and ceiling
columns: installing a new ceiling, drywall, and woodwork. The
organization points out that while notice was given, it was not
given within the proper time limits outlined in the Agreement.
Based upon Carrier's extensive list of the subcontracting of
projects over the years, this Board is not convinced that the type
of work being done (that is, the remodeling of an office building)
is the type of work that has customarily been performed by
employees covered by the parties' Agreement. While there is no
dispute that they have done such jobs on occasion--and in fact did
so on the current project--there is insufficient evidence that they
did so to such a degree as to say that the work was performed on a
customary, historical, or traditional basis. Thus, it does not
fall within the purview of Rule 52.
AWARD
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
Linda Woods - Arbitration Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of June 1994.