Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 30252
Docket No. SG-30802
94-3-92-3-616
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Elizabeth C. Wesman when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (and
(Chicago & North Western Transportation Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim of the General Committee, Brotherhood of Railroad
Signalmen, on the Chicago North Western Transportation
Company that:
(a) Carrier violated the current Agreement, as
amended, between the Brotherhood of Railroad
Signalmen and the Chicago North Western,
especially Rule 51, when Mr. Fred Claxton,
following formal investigation held on August
1, 1991, "To determine your responsibility for
violating Rule
11611,
as contained in Time Table
No. 11, effective Nov. 18, 1990, when on July
9, 1991, a urine sample provided by you, as
part of a D.O.T. physical, resulted in a
positive test for a controlled substance", was
issued the discipline of dismissal.
(b) Carrier should now be required to reinstate
Mr. Fred Claxton to his former position as
assistant signalman with all seniority rights
and benefits restored and compensated for all
time lost."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employe or employes involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employe within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Form 1 Award No. 30252
Page 2 Docket No. SG-30802
94-3-92-3-616
Claimant was employed as an Assistant Signalman on Job 400-02
(Crew 2) in Berkeley, Illinois. On July 9, 1991, Claimant was
required to take a Department of Transportation (DOT) physical
examination in accordance with DOT Safety Regulations. A urine
sample taken during that physical tested positive for cocaine in
Claimant's system. As a result, Claimant was removed from service
pending
Investigation. Subsequent
to the Investigation, Claimant
was dismissed from carrier's service.
The Organization attempted to discredit the urinalysis results
by claiming: 1) that the required "chain of custody" of Claimant's
specimen was not maintained; and 2) that a subsequent urinalyses to
which Claimant voluntarily subjected himself yielded negative
results. Neither argument is persuasive. The organization failed
to discredit the chain of custody. Further, once an initial
positive test result was obtained, a confirming chromatography/mass
spectrometry test was performed by the laboratory. That test also
yielded positive results.
The two urinalyses to which Claimant voluntarily submitted
took place eight and thirteen days, respectively, from the date his
initial urine specimen was obtained. Moreover, Claimant did not
submit "chain of custody" verification or certification of the
laboratory performing analysis of the later specimens in his
defense. Accordingly, they cannot be considered to refute the
initial test results.
Under the circumstances, the Board finds no basis upon which
to disturb Carrier's assessment of discipline.
AWARD
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Attest:
X4,=
WN,~,
Linda Woods - Arbitration Assistant
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 8th day of June 1994.