Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 30262
Docket No. MW-30165
94-3-91-3-611

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Hugh G. Duffy when award was rendered.



PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the

Brotherhood that:


        (1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier used an outside concern (Gordon Todd, General Contractor) to perform excavation, preparing surfaces, setting concrete forms, pouring and finishing concrete for the new Radio Shop Building attached to the CTC Building at Salt Lake City, Utah, from February 21 to and including April 2, 1990 (System File 5306/900415).


    (2) TheAgreement was further violated when the

    Carrier used an outside concern (Gordon Todd,

    General Contractor) to perform the concrete

    flat work, framing, masonry work, taping,

    texturing, roofing, installation of a parapet

    wall, concrete steps concrete landing,

    concrete sidewalk and installation of

    handrails for the new Radio Shop Building

    attached to the CTC Building at Salt Lake

    City, Utah, from March 8 through April 26,

    1990 (System File S-313/900426).


        (3) The Agreement was further violated when the Carrier used an outside concern (Mastertouch Painting) to paint the new Radio Shop Building attached to the CTC Building at Salt Lake City, Utah, on April 10, 11, and 12, 1990 (5317/900438).


        (4) As a consequence of the violation referred to in Part (1) above, furloughed Utah Division Carpenters D. A. Holt and B. L. Holt and Carpenter Machine Operator T. F. Sweat shall each be allowed thirty-five and one-third (35 1/3) hours' pay at their respective straight time rates of pay.

Form 1 Award No. 30262
Page 2 Docket No. MW-30165
                                            94-3-91-3-611


          (5) As a consequence of the violation referred to in Part (2) above, furloughed Utah Division Carpenters D. A. Holt and B. L. Holt and Specialized Mason S. K. Stuart shall each be allowed one hundred seventy-one and one-fourth (171 1/4) hours' pay at their respective straight times of pay.


          (6) As a consequence of the violation referred to in Part (3) above, furloughed Utah Division Painter D. A. Holt shall be allowed fifty-six (56) hours' pay at the First Class Painter's straight time rate."


FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein. .


Parties-to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.


After first serving notice on the Organization of its intent to subcontract, the Carrier proceeded to utilize an outside contractor to construct a company building at Salt Lake City, Utah.


The organization alleges that this work has customarily and traditionally been assigned to and performed by its members, and that the Carrier violated Rule 52 of the Agreement when it contracted out the work.


    Rule 52 reads in pertinent part as follows:

Form 1 Award No. 30262
Page 3 Docket No. MW-30165
                                            94-3-91-3-611


    " RULE 52, CONTRACTING


      (a) By Agreement between the Company andthe

      General Chairman work customarily performed by

      employees covered under this Agreement may be

      let to contractors and performed by

      contractors' forces. However, such work may

      only be contracted provided that special

      skills not possessed by the Company's

      employees, special equipment not owned by the

      Company, or special material available only

      when applied or installed through supplier,

      are required: or when work is such that the

      company is not adequately equipped to handle

      the work, or when emergency time requirements

      exist which present undertakings not

      contemplated by the Agreement and beyond the

      capacity of the Company's forces. In the

      event the Company plans to contract out work

      because of one of the criteria described

      herein, it shall notify the General Chairman

      of the Organization in writing as far in

      advance of the date of the contracting

      transaction as is practicable and in any event

      not less than fifteen (15) days prior thereto,

      except in 'emergency time requirements' cases.

      If the General chairman, or his

      representative, requests a meeting to discuss

      matters relating to the said contracting

      transaction, the designated representative of

      the Company shall promptly meet with him for

      that purpose. Said Company and organization

      representative shall make a good faith attempt

      to reach an understanding concerning said

      contracting but if no understanding is reached

      the Company may nevertheless proceed with said

      contracting, and the Organization may file and

      progress claims in connection therewith.


        (b) Nothing contained in this rule shall affect prior and existing rights and practices of either party in connection with contracting out. Its purpose is to require the Carrier to give advance notice and if requested, to meet with the General Chairman or his representative to discuss and if possible reach an understanding in connection therewith.

Form 1 Award No. 30262
Page 4 Docket No. MW-30165
94-3-91-3-611

          (d) Nothing contained in this rule shall impair the Company's right to assign work not customarily performed by employees covered by this Agreement to outside contractors."


The issue presented in this dispute has been addressed by the Board on numerous occasions. For example, in Third Division Award 29037, the Board concluded:

      "The Scope Rule is a general Rule and the on-property record is conclusive that the work has not been "customarily" performed by employees. The letters submitted by B&B Painters do not refute the Carrier's evidence that it utilized outside forces for decades to perform work which included painting. The organization's rebuttal on the property of the sixty-four year record, including the point that the Omaha headquarters was painted by outside contractors only three times in that period, is not on point. It is central to this dispute that proof has been presented by the Carrier that outside forces historically painted buildings, including the Headquarters Building. This probative evidence removes this work from that which the Carrier is restricted from contracting out and is required to give advance notice."


Numerous decisions of the Board have held that the Carrier has the right under Sections (b) and (d) of Rule 52 to contract out work where advance notice is given and the Carrier has established a mixed past practice of contracting out work similar to that involved in the dispute. The record in this case demonstrates a mixed practice on this property with respect to the work in question. It has been performed by members subject to the Agreement in the past but has also been contracted out by the Carrier in the past. We thus conclude that the Carrier did not violate the Agreement when it contracted out the work.


                          AWARD


    Claim denied.

Form 1 Award No. 30262
Page 5 Docket No. MW-30165
94-3-91-3-611

                        O R D E R


This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                          By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of July 1994.