Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 30262
Docket No. MW-30165
94-3-91-3-611
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Hugh G. Duffy when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier
used an outside concern (Gordon Todd, General
Contractor) to perform excavation, preparing
surfaces, setting concrete forms, pouring and
finishing concrete for the new Radio Shop
Building attached to the CTC Building at Salt
Lake City, Utah, from February 21 to and
including April 2, 1990 (System File 5306/900415).
(2) TheAgreement was further violated when the
Carrier used an outside concern (Gordon Todd,
General Contractor) to perform the concrete
flat work, framing, masonry work, taping,
texturing, roofing, installation of a parapet
wall, concrete steps concrete landing,
concrete sidewalk and installation of
handrails for the new Radio Shop Building
attached to the CTC Building at Salt Lake
City, Utah, from March 8 through April 26,
1990 (System File S-313/900426).
(3) The Agreement was further violated when the
Carrier used an outside concern (Mastertouch
Painting) to paint the new Radio Shop Building
attached to the CTC Building at Salt Lake
City, Utah, on April 10, 11, and 12, 1990 (5317/900438).
(4) As a consequence of the violation referred to
in Part (1) above, furloughed Utah Division
Carpenters D. A. Holt and B. L. Holt and
Carpenter Machine Operator T. F. Sweat shall
each be allowed thirty-five and one-third (35
1/3) hours' pay at their respective straight
time rates of pay.
Form 1 Award
No. 30262
Page 2 Docket
No. MW-30165
94-3-91-3-611
(5)
As a consequence of the violation referred to
in Part
(2)
above, furloughed Utah Division
Carpenters D. A. Holt and B. L. Holt and
Specialized Mason S. K. Stuart shall each be
allowed one hundred seventy-one and one-fourth
(171 1/4)
hours' pay at their respective
straight times of pay.
(6)
As a consequence of the violation referred to
in Part
(3)
above, furloughed Utah Division
Painter D. A. Holt shall be allowed fifty-six
(56)
hours' pay at the First Class Painter's
straight time rate."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein. .
Parties-to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
After first serving notice on the Organization of its intent
to subcontract, the Carrier proceeded to utilize an outside
contractor to construct a company building at Salt Lake City, Utah.
The organization alleges that this work has customarily and
traditionally been assigned to and performed by its members, and
that the Carrier violated Rule
52
of the Agreement when it
contracted out the work.
Rule
52
reads in pertinent part as follows:
Form 1 Award No. 30262
Page 3 Docket No. MW-30165
94-3-91-3-611
" RULE 52, CONTRACTING
(a) By Agreement between the Company andthe
General Chairman work customarily performed by
employees covered under this Agreement may be
let to contractors and performed by
contractors' forces. However, such work may
only be contracted provided that special
skills not possessed by the Company's
employees, special equipment not owned by the
Company, or special material available only
when applied or installed through supplier,
are required: or when work is such that the
company is not adequately equipped to handle
the work, or when emergency time requirements
exist which present undertakings not
contemplated by the Agreement and beyond the
capacity of the Company's forces. In the
event the Company plans to contract out work
because of one of the criteria described
herein, it shall notify the General Chairman
of the Organization in writing as far in
advance of the date of the contracting
transaction as is practicable and in any event
not less than fifteen (15) days prior thereto,
except in 'emergency time requirements' cases.
If the General chairman, or his
representative, requests a meeting to discuss
matters relating to the said contracting
transaction, the designated representative of
the Company shall promptly meet with him for
that purpose. Said Company and organization
representative shall make a good faith attempt
to reach an understanding concerning said
contracting but if no understanding is reached
the Company may nevertheless proceed with said
contracting, and the Organization may file and
progress claims in connection therewith.
(b) Nothing contained in this rule shall affect
prior and existing rights and practices of
either party in connection with contracting
out. Its purpose is to require the Carrier to
give advance notice and if requested, to meet
with the General Chairman or his
representative to discuss and if possible
reach an understanding in connection
therewith.
Form 1 Award No. 30262
Page 4 Docket No. MW-30165
94-3-91-3-611
(d) Nothing contained in this rule shall impair
the Company's right to assign work not
customarily performed by employees covered by
this Agreement to outside contractors."
The issue presented in this dispute has been addressed by the
Board on numerous occasions. For example, in Third Division Award
29037, the Board concluded:
"The Scope Rule is a general Rule and the on-property
record is conclusive that the work has not been
"customarily" performed by employees. The letters
submitted by B&B Painters do not refute the Carrier's
evidence that it utilized outside forces for decades to
perform work which included painting. The organization's
rebuttal on the property of the sixty-four year record,
including the point that the Omaha headquarters was
painted by outside contractors only three times in that
period, is not on point. It is central to this dispute
that proof has been presented by the Carrier that outside
forces historically painted buildings, including the
Headquarters Building. This probative evidence removes
this work from that which the Carrier is restricted from
contracting out and is required to give advance notice."
Numerous decisions of the Board have held that the Carrier has
the right under Sections (b) and (d) of Rule 52 to contract out
work where advance notice is given and the Carrier has established
a mixed past practice of contracting out work similar to that
involved in the dispute. The record in this case demonstrates a
mixed practice on this property with respect to the work in
question. It has been performed by members subject to the
Agreement in the past but has also been contracted out by the
Carrier in the past. We thus conclude that the Carrier did not
violate the Agreement when it contracted out the work.
AWARD
Claim denied.
Form 1 Award No. 30262
Page 5 Docket No. MW-30165
94-3-91-3-611
O R D E R
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified
above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not
be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of July 1994.