Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 30269
Docket No. MW-30050
94-3-91-3-461
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Dana E. Eischen when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad Company (former
( Missouri Pacific Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the carrier
assigned outside forces (Determan and Merrill
Contracting) with a tractor, a forklift, three
(3) trackhoes, three (3) trucks and twenty
(20) employees to pick up, load and haul rail
starting at Mile Post 195 beginning April 17,
1990, and continuing (Carrier's File 900541
MPR).
(2) The Agreement was further violated when the
carrier failed and refused to furnish the
General Chairman with advance written notice
of its intention to contract out said work as
required by Article IV and the December il,
1981 Letter of Agreement.
(3) As a consequence of the violations referred to
in Parts (1) and/or (2) above, KO&G Division
Track Foreman K. W. Lynch, Assistant Foreman
C. K. Loch, Machine Operators N. L. Harjo, J.
J. Boyd, B. W. Griffin, B. T. Brown, R. D.
McDonald, Trackmen J. C. Lee, J. P. Mericle,
F. Jacobs, W. L. King, D. W. Tarpalachee, and
D. Johnson shall be allowed an equal
proportionate share of all time worked by
contractors on the KO&G Division beginning
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
Form 1 Award No. 30269
Page 2 Docket No. MW30050
94-3-91-3-461
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
The Organization alleges that Carrier violated the Scope Rule,
Rules 1 and 2 of the Agreement, the National Agreement of May 1968
and the "Letter of Good Faith" of December 11, 1981, when it
"assigned outside forces to pick up, load and haul rail and failed
to furnish the General Chairman with advance written notice." The
work in dispute involved removal of approximately 166.5 miles of
abandoned track on the Oklahoma Subdivision between Muskogee,
Oklahoma (MP 130.00) and ROG Junction, Oklahoma (MP 297.6). It
should be noted that the facts set forth in this dispute are
indistinguishable from those issues in companion Third Division
Award 30268.
In a letter dated December 28, 1989, Carrier advised the
Organization as follows:
"This is to advise of the carrier's intent to solicit
bids to cover the removal of trackage appurtenances on
the Oklahoma Subdivision between Muskogee, Oklahoma (MP
130.00) and KOG Junction, Oklahoma (MP 297.6) in
conjunction with Company forces. Estimated duration of
project will be between six to twelve months.
This is the type of work that has customarily and
traditionally been performed by outside contractor's
forces. The Carrier has neither the skilled manpower nor
the proper equipment to safely and competently undertake
and complete this project in a timely manner.
Serving of this 'Notice' is not to be construed as an
indication that the work described above necessarily
falls within the 'scope' of your Agreement, nor as an
indication that such work is necessarily reserved as a
matter of practice, to those employes represented by the
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes."
Therefore, the Organization's claim that Carrier "failed to
furnish the General Chairman with advance written notice" is
dismissed without further discussion.
Form 1 Award No. 30269
Page 3 Docket No. NW30050
94-3-91-3-461
There is no dispute that Determan and Merrill's bid for the
purchase and removal of a portion of the abandoned line, "as is
where is", was accepted.
On June 15, 1990, the Organization filed a claim for "an equal
proportionate share of all time worked by contractors on Claimants'
territory beginning April 17, 1990, and continuing."
As stated previously, the facts presented in this dispute are
not distinguishable from those presented in companion Third
Division Award 30268. For reasons set forth in that Award, this
claim must also be denied. See also: Third Division Awards 29873,
29394, 29559, 29016, 28615, 28489, 28488, 20851, 12918, and 10826.
AWARD
Claim denied.
0 R
D E
R
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified
above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not
be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois this 19th day of July 1994.