The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Herbert L. Marx,"Jr. when award was rendered.
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of-the Railway Labor Act: as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon. Form 1 Award No. 30522
The International Brotherhood of Boilermakers & Blacksmiths was determined to be a third party at interest. That Organization was notified of the dispute, but,.3id not submit a response.
This dispute arises from the Coordination Agreement of September 17, 1985, involving the consolidation of work at Barboursville and Martinsburg. One result of this was the elimination of the position of Material Reclaimer, with employees holding that title being integrated into the roster of Assistant Foreman.
At issue is the question of dismantling frogs for the purpose of reclaiming them for further use. The record shows that the disassembly of frogs has been performed by Maintenance of way forces and by Blacksmiths. In this instance, such dismantling was performed by Blacksmiths as part of their assignment in reclaiming the frogs.
The Organization contends that the dismantling portion of the work should have been assigned to Maintenance of Way employees in the capacity of Material Reclaimer. For support, the Organization points to Rule 66(b), which states in pertinent part as follows:
Based on the record, both Maintenance of Way employees and Blacksmiths have been assigned to the dismantling work at both Martinsburg and Barboursville. As best as can be determined, Maintenance of Way forces have generally been assigned to the work when the material involved is to be scrapped, while Blacksmiths have been involved, as here, where the frogs are to be reclaimed for further use, and the frogs are already "in the shop."
It is also noted that Rule 66 (b) as quoted above, refers to work on frogs (installing, maintaining, removing) but does not specify the work of dismantling frogs.
Thus, in this instance, the Board finds no violation in the disassembly work performed by the Blacksmiths when it was in connection with their customary reclaiming work on the frogs. Form 1 Award No. 30522
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.