Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 30687
Docket No. MW-30096
95-3-91-3-526
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr., when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad company (former
( Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier
assigned outside forces (National Salvage) to
perform the '* * * cutting, and loading the
ribbon rail onto a rail train, knocking off
rail anchors, bagging rail anchors, straight
railing switches, and general clean up. * * *'
on the Concordia Subdivision on June 1 through
June 30, 1990 (Carrier's File 900608 MPR).
(2) The below listed Claimants* shall each be
allowed pay at their respective rates of pay
in the amount of eight (8) hours per day at
the straight time rate, and four (4) hours per
day at 'Se punitive rate for June 1, 4, 5, 6,
7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22,
25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and twelve (12) hours per
day at the punitive rate for June 2, 3, 9, 10,
16, 17, 23, 24 and 30, 1990.
* S. R. Schaefer J. B. Van Nortwick D. B. Wilson
K. E. Handke G. H. Hill C. L. Hollis
K. S. Williams J. W. Moeck R. D. Smith
M. F. Petesch F. L. Mueseler J. S. Horton
M. H. Hennigh M. W. Wilburn M. T. White
R. L. Shorb W. E. Juilfs E. D. Bonebrake"
H. D. Gibbs S. M. Thomas
Form 1 Award No. 30687
Page 2 Docket No. MW-30096
95-3-91-3-526
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
This dispute is virtually identical to that reviewed in Third
Division Award 30683. It involves the same notice of proposed
contracting for the same project. The difference is confined to
the dates for which Agreement violation is claimed.
In this instance, the Board reaches the same conclusions.
AWARD
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
O R D E R
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified
above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) be
made. The Carrier is ordered to make the Award effective on or
before 30 days following the postmark date the Award is transmitted
to the parties.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of January 1995.