Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 30688
Docket No. MW-30098
95-3-91-3-528
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad Company (former
( Missouri Pacific Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the carrier assigned
outside forces to cut brush along the right of way
between Mile Posts 380 state line to 370 Hiawatha,
Kansas, and Mile Posts 331 Atchison to 298 Wolcott,
Kansas from July 2 through July 15, 1990 (Carrier's File
900609 MPR).
(2) The Carrier also violated Article IV of the May 27,
1968 National Agreement when it did not give the General
Chairman advance written notice of its intention to
contract said work.
(3) As a consequence of the violations referred to in
Parts (1) and/or (2) above, Foreman R. D. Underwood and
Trackmen J. W. Moeck, M. F. Petesch, R. D. Smith, and K.
E. Handke shall each be allowed pay at their respective
rates of pay eight (8) hours per day at the straight time
rate and six (6) hours per day at the punitive rate for
July 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13, and fourteen (14)
hours per day at the punitive rate for July 4, 7, 8, 14,
and 15, 1990."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Form 1 Award No. 30688
Page 2 Docket No. MW-30098
95-3-91-3-528
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
By letter dated May 11, 1989, the Carrier notified the
Organization of its intention "to solicit bids to cover the cutting
of brush and trees along with the chemical application of all
stumps within the cutting area" between points in Kansas and
Nebraska. Following conference, which had been requested by the
organization, no accord was reached. The Carrier subsequently
proceeded to contract this work to an outside firm. This resulted
in the organization's claim that the work should have been assigned
to Maintenance of Way forces.
This is one of a great many instances involving this Carrier
and the organization in dispute as to the assignment of work to
outside forces. The Board does not question that Maintenance of
Way forces have performed this work in many prior instances.
However, the Carrier also provided evidence that the work in
question had been contracted to outside firms frequently over many
years. Third Division Award 29007, one of many recent Awards
involving contracting by the Carrier, has reasoning which is
applicable to the facts and circumstances herein. That Award
concluded as follows:
"The Organization has the burden of proving by a
preponderance of the evidence that the disputed work is
of a character customarily and historically performed by
the employees it represents. While, as described
earlier, we do not find this burden to require a showing
of exclusive performance, it does require proof of more
than a shared or mixed practice."
Here, the record shows there is a "shared or mixed practice"
over the years as to brush cutting and closely related work. On
this basis and having met the requirement of notice and conference,
the Carrier's action cannot be found in violation of the Agreement.
AWARD
Claim denied.
Form 1 Award No. 30688
Page 3 Docket No. MW-30098
95-3-91-3-528
O R D E R
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified
above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not
be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of January 1995.