Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 30754
Docket No. MW-30239
95-3-91-3-695
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad Company (former
( Missouri Pacific Railroad)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier
assigned outside forces (Marlatt Contracting) on
September 13, 1990 to remove crossing planks, crossties
and old ballast and replace same on the highway crossing
at Mile Post 527 and on September 14, 1990 to push weeds
and brush away from road crossings between Mile Post 490
and Mile Post 488 (Carrier's File 910090 MPR).
(2) The Carrier also violated Article IV of the May
17, 1968 National Agreement when it failed to furnish the
General Chairman with advance written notice of its
intention to contract out said work.
(3) As a consequence of the violations referred to
in Parts (1) and/or (2) above, Omaha Division Machine
Operator J. L. Hardenberger shall be allowed thirteen
(13) hours' pay at his straight time rate."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Form 1 Award No. 30754
Page 2 Docket No. MW-30239
95-3-91-3-695
Under date of July 17, 1990, the Carrier provided notice to
the General Chairman of its intention to contract work at crossing
on Highway No. 128 on the Concordia Subdivision, together with
removal of weeds and brush in connection therewith. The matter was
discussed at conference with the General Chairman on July 23, 1990.
No agreement being reached, the Carrier proceeded to contract the
work.
Four previous Awards on the property are cited in connection
with the contracting of crossing work. In contrast to the dispute
here under review, all four Awards concerned instances in which no
advance notice was provided to the General Chairman, and the Claims
were sustained on this basis alone. No monetary remedy was
provided in these instances, based to some extent on the
organization's failure to protest numerous previous instances of
contracting the same work. Third Division Award 29677, however,
also examined the merits of the dispute, concluding as follows:
"The record in this case demonstrates a mixed
practice on this property with respect to the work in
question. It has apparently been performed by members
subject to the Agreement in the past but has also
apparently been contracted out by the Carrier in the
past. Thus, while the work could, based on the record
before us, be contracted out under the provisions of
Article IV [of the May 17, 1968 National Agreement], the
carrier is required to give notice before doing so."
The facts here persuade the Board that this reasoning is
equally applicable to this claim. Since advance notice was
provided, a denial Award becomes appropriate.
AWARD
Claim denied.
O R D E R
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified
above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not
be made.
Form 1 Award No. 30754
Page 3 Docket No. MW-30239
95-3-91-3-695
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 24th day of February 1995.