The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant C. Polk established and holds seniority as a Track Foreman in the Track Subdepartment on the Florence-Savannah Seniority District. Claimants D. Johnson, E. Charles, Jr., J. O'Banner, F. Goodwin and C. Mumford, Jr. established and hold seniority as Trackmen in the Track Subdepartment on same. Beginning September 25, 1989, Claimants were assigned to Extra Force 6F02 to perform work on track on the Orangeburg Subdivision, a portion of the Florence-Savannah Seniority District.
By Superintendent's Bulletin South:S-34, dated December 21, 1989, Carrier announced the abandonment of that portion of the Orangeburg Subdivision between MP AK295.17 at Florence, South Carolina, and MP AK304.38 at Timmonsville, South Carolina. Claimants were utilized to dismantle and recover materials from the subject track until April 5, 1990, at which time Extra Force 6F02 was abolished and Claimants were furloughed from Carrier's service. Carrier subsequently contracted with C & S Salvage to complete dismantling the abandoned track and complete the salvage work. It is not disputed that Carrier did not give Rule 2 notice to the General Chairman, nor engage in Rule 2 discussions with the organization. On April 29, 1991, the subcontractor commenced the dismantling/salvage work which is the subject of this claim.
On June 21, 1991, the organization submitted this claim, alleging that Carrier violated Rules 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 13, 20, 27, 40 and "any other rules which might be applicable when it utilized an outside Contractor to the exclusion of its own Maintenance of Way personnel," and did not afford the organization notice of its intent to do so. The Organization further alleged that the area that C & S Salvage was removing was still "connected to the mainline and is still live trackage which is being utilized by CSX Supervisor personnel running trains on it."
Regarding the underlying facts, Carrier denied the Organization's assertions that the track remained "live," but the following assertions by the organization remain undisputed on this record:
So far as the record shows, this was not "as is where is" salvage and removal of abandoned scrap track material by a Contractor-Purchaser, but rather dismantling of high grade used track material for recycling and reuse by and for Carrier. That fundamental fact distinguishes this case from that in our recent Third Division Award 30716 and the line of precedent cited therein. Carrier's removal of this work from the scope of the Agreement without at least the requisite notice and discussions under Rule 2 constituted a plain violation of Claimant's and the Organization's Agreement rights.
Finally, Carrier failed to address the issue of damages during handling on the property. It has long been held that the Board is restricted to evidence presented on the property. carrier's belated attempt to argue the issue of damages in its Submission to this Board comes too late to be considered. Third Division Awards 27614 and 26593 are ample precedent for sustaining these claims for monetary damages. Form 1 Award No. 30982
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) be made. The Carrier is ordered to make the Award effective on or before 30 days following the postmark date the Award is transmitt-ad to the parties.