Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD A STMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 31026
Docket No. Mod®25454
95-3®08®3®259
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Edwin H. Benn when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad Company
____. ____'_ "Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it
assigned outside forces to perform the work of
removing and replacing structural beams and
building and rebuilding foot walks on the
steel drawbridge between East Portland and
Union station in Portland, Oregon, beginning
January 5, 1987 (System File M®576/570569).
(2) The Agreement was further violated when the
Carrier did not give the General. Chairman
prior written notification of its plan to
assign said work to outside forces.
(3) As a consequence of the violations referred to
in Parts (1) and/or (2) above, Steel Erection
employes J. D. Bowen, S. E. Burgus, B. L.
Flannery, L. H. Kelly, K. E. Murphy, R. R.
McDonald and H. S. Role shall each be allowed
pay at their respective rates for an equal
proportionate share of the sic thousand seven
hundred twenty (6,720) man-hours expended by
the outside forces during the claim period."
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds theta
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21,
1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Form 1 Award No. 31026
Page 2 Docket No. MW-28454
95-3-88-3-259
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
letter dated August 13, 1986, the Carrier informed the
organization as follows*
I_
O'S
imply as information, a contractor wy~. be
u
,utilized to
replace and lubricate the 64 upper deck counter weight
ropes on the double deck lift span of Bridge 0.43 across
the Willamette liver at Portland, Oregon.
A firm specializing in this work has always performed
this service."
ne Carrier that it met its notice obligations. With
The asserts respect to this notice, the carrier®s records show that conference
was held on December 11, 1966 and that the project was "done'.
However, while the carrier's records show that as of the
,,
December 11, 1986 conference teas projeca- ~. covered
a,,
the AasgUst 13,
_
1986 notice was °done", the contractor did not commence the work
involved in this dispute until January 5, 1987. Moreover, the work
involved in this dispute was not the replacement and lubrication of
the 64 upper deck counter weight ropes as specified in the notice
relied upon by the carrier. Rather, the work involved in this
dispute was the removing and replacing structural beams and
building and rebuilding foot walks on the steel drawbridge.
Based o:. '~^ a-=,e, we are satisfied that the work specified
*~.=G
..
in the August 13, 1986 notice relied upon by the Carrier was not
the work involved in this dispute. We therefore find that the
Carrier contracted out the work involved in this dispute without
notice to the Organization as required by Rule 52.
As a remedy, the matter is
remanded to
the parties to
determine the number o_ hours expended by the contractor on this
project. Claimants shall be made whole for the proportionate
amount of that time to cover periods, if any, that they were ire
furlough status during the time the contractor performed the work
in question.
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
Form 1 Award No. 31026
Page 3 Docket Nom Mw-28454
95-3-88®3-259
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified
above,
hereby orders
that an award favorable to the Claimantfs) be
made
`TN--
Carrier =
~
~s ordered to mace the sward effective an or
before 30 days following the postmark date the Award is transmitted
to the parties.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
Fay Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 1st day of September 1995.