Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 31068
Docket No. SG-31297
95-3-92-3-845
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee James E. Mason when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim on behalf of the General Committee of the
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen (BRS) on the Union
Pacific Railroad (UP):
Claim on behalf of M.A. Stecki for assignment to the
position of Retarder Yard Maintainer and for all
lost compensation on account Carrier violated the
current Signalmen's Agreement, particularly Rule 38,
when it failed to properly post job bulletins and
awarded the Retarder Yard Maintainer position to a
junior employee. Carrier's File No. 910759. BRS
File Case No. 8888-UP."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
This dispute involves an assertion by the organization that
Claimant has been deprived of the opportunity to bid for and be
assigned to a Retarder Yard Maintainer position which was
bulletined by carrier and subsequently awarded to a junior
Signalman. The organization argued that Carrier failed to post the
advertising bulletin as required by Rule 38 of the Agreement.
Form 1 Award No. 31068
Page 2 Docket No. SG-31297
95-3-92-3-845
Rule 38 reads, in pertinent part, as follows:
"RULE 38 - BULLETINED POSITIONS
(a) New positions and vacancies, excepting
positions of Assistant Signalmen and Assistant
Signal Technicians, which are expected to be of more
than six months' duration shall be advertised as
permanent within thirty (30) calendar days previous
to or ten calendar days following the date such new
position is created or a vacancy occurs. New
positions and vacancies of more than thirty (30)
calendar days and less than six months' duration
shall be advertised within the above time limits as
temporary. Except when temporary vacancy is due to
physical disability of employe, a position which has
been advertised as temporary and does in fact exceed
six months, shall be readvertised at the end of six
months as permanent. Bulletins showing location,
title, hours of service and rate of pay will be made
accessible to the employes affected for a period of
ten calendar days. In gangs, bulletins will be
posted on a bulletin board in the tool car.
Employees desiring such positions shall file their
application with the designated official, with copy
to Local Chairman, within that time and an
assignment will be made within five calendar days
thereafter. Employes affected and the Local
Chairman will be promptly advised of the assignment
made. When an employe's location of headquarters is
changed, position will be bulletined."
From the case record as developed by the parties during the
on-property handling of this dispute, the following facts are
apparent:
1. Carrier issued an advertising bulletin on July
22, 1991, which contained, among other
vacancies, the position here in contention.
2. Claimant was away from his assigned position
because of being on vacation which began on
July 22, 1991, and continued through August
8, 1991.
3. The assignment of the junior employee, who was
the only applicant for the position, was made
effective August 6, 1991.
Form 1 Award No. 31068
Page 3 Docket No. SG-31297
95-3-92-3-845
4. Upon his return from vacation, Claimant
submitted on August 12, 1991, a bid for the
position in question. His bid was rejected as
untimely.
In defense of its position, Carrier argued that the
advertising bulletin had been properly posted; that Claimant's
bid came too late for consideration for the position: that, in
any event, Claimant did not possess the appropriate radio license
which was required for assignment to the position in question.
From our review of the record in this case, the Board finds
several points of concern. First, there is a statement by the
Organization that the advertising bulletin was not posted in the
"tool car" of the gang to which Claimant was assigned. No
exception is voiced to Carrier's contention that the bulletin was
posted "in the usual manner" or that there is no tool car
assigned to the gang" and there has not been one within the
memory of anyone now there." With nothing more on which to make
a determination, the Board is unable to say whether or not the
bulletin had been properly posted.
Secondly, and of more significance in our determinations of
this dispute, is the fact that Claimant was off duty observing
his vacation during the entire bulletining period. Claimant
would not have seen the bulletin because of his absence on
vacation.
Thirdly, and of most significance in our determinations of
this dispute, is the fact that the record is completely devoid of
any evidence that Claimant possessed the radio license which is
required for assignment to the position in question. Therefore,
the issue of proper posting of the bulletin is moot at best and
is not determinative in this case.
On the basis of the relative convincing force of evidence as
found in this case, the Board concludes that there has been no
proven violation of Rule 38.
AWARD
Claim denied.
Form 1 Award No. 31068
Page 4 Docket No. SG-31297
95-3-92-3-845
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified
above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant (s) not
be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 1st day of September 1995.