The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Robert L. Hicks when award was rendered.
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant was charged with negligence in failing to maintain battery backup systems at two locations within his assigned territory.
After a timely held Investigation, Claimant was discharged from Carrier's.services. Form 1 Award No. 31138
In contrast to the Employees contention, Carrier did clearly establish Claimant's culpability for the charges assessed and further, the discipline of dismissal in this instance was not excessive nor an abuse of Carrier's authority.
From October of 1990 to November of 1992 the Carrier found it necessary to charge Claimant with the same charge i.e. failure to maintain batteries, three times. The first charge resulted in 45 demerits, the second resulted in a 16 day suspension upheld by Third Division Award 31009 and the third charge that resulted in dismissal zhe case here in dispute). Enough is enough.
The Carrier can no longer gamble with the safety of its employees and the pedestrian vehicular traffic. Claimant has been negligent in maintaining the back-up system in his assigned territory. This Board will not interfere in the discipline assessed.
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.