Form
1
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 31466
Docket No. CL-32104
96-3-94-3-511
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in
addition Referee Robert Richter when award was rendered.
(Transportation Communications International
( Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Seaboard
( Coast Line Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: "Claim of the System Committee of the
Union (GL-11094) that:
1. Carrier violated the Agreement on Sunday, March 14,
1993, when it improperly withheld Clerk R.J. Sparks from
Position No. 302 in the Customer Service Center in
Jacksonville, Florida.
2. . As a result of the aforementioned violation, Carrier
shall now be required to compensate Clerk Sparks (609953)
eight (8) hours' pay at the straight time rate of
$115.36."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved
in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the
meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing
thereon.
Claimant was employed as a Customer Service Agent at the
Customer Service Center in Jacksonville, Florida. On March 14, 1993
the Claimant's position was abolished under the provisions of Rule
17 (b) which reads as follows:
Form
1
Award No. 31466
Page 2 Docket No. CL-32104
96-3-94-3-511
"(b) Rules, agreements or practices, however
established, that require advance notice to employees
before abolishing positions or making force reductions
are hereby modified to eliminate any requirements for
such notices under emergency conditions, such as flood,
snow storm, hurricane, tornado, earthquake, fire or labor
dispute other than as covered by paragraph (c) below,
provided that such conditions result in suspension of a
Carrier's operations in whole or in part. It is
understood and agreed that such force reductions will be
confined solely to those work locations directly affected
by any suspension of operations. It is further understood
and agreed that notwithstanding the foregoing, any
employee who is affected by an emergency force reduction
and reports for work for his position without having been
previously notified not to report, shall receive four (4)
hours' pay at the applicable rate for his position. If an
employee works any portion of the day he will be paid in
accordance with existing rules."
The case rests on whether the Carrier properly abolished the
Claimant's position under the terms of Rule 17 (b). The Carrier
argues that as the result of a snow, sleet and ice storm the
Carrier had to shut down a majority of its train operations on the
east coast, a point never disputed by the Organization. The Carrier
further argues that because of the shut down in train operations
its Customer Service Center in Jacksonville was affected.
The Organization argues the weather in Jacksonville was not
that severe, in fact some employees did work at the Customer
Service Center on March 14. The Carrier argues that those employees
who did work were those employees the Carrier could not contact
before they got to work. Both parties argued as to the severity of
the weather in Jacksonville. However, the organization never
disputed the Carrier's argument that train operations were
suspended over most of the east coast. The key provision of Rule
17 (b) as it pertains to this case is the sentence that reads:
"...It is understood and agreed that such force
reductions will be confined solely to those work
locations directly affected by any suspension of
operations."
The Rule clearly states that the force reductions are limited
to locations affected by the suspension of operations, not
locations affected by the storm.
The Organization has not refuted the Carrier's argument that
the Customer Service Center was affected by the suspension of
operations caused by the storm.
Form 1 Award No. 31466
Page 3 Docket No. CL-32104
96-3-91-3-511
This Board finds the Agreement was not violated.
AWARD
Claim denied.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified
above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant (s) not
be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of April 1996.