This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
Claimant was working Position No. 263 at the Carrier's Storehouse at Waycross, Georgia. It is undisputed that due to technological advances, Position No. 263 requires a considerable amount of CRT input which Claimant was unable to perform. After a three-way telephone conversation between the Manager Inventory Control, the District Chairman and the vice General Chairman, the Manager Inventory Control disqualified the Claimant from all clerical positions within the Purchases and Materials Department effective January 29, 1993. The organization avers that the telephone conference call only concerned Position No. 263, not all positions in the Department. It concedes it agreed to Claimant's disqualification on Position No. 263, but never agreed that Claimant should be disqualified from all positions in the Department.
On February 24, 1993 Claimant requested an Unjust Treatment Hearing under the provisions of Rule :0. On March 19, 1993 the Hearing was conducted by a Purchasing =.gent.
On March 22, 1993 the Organization and the Carrier entered into a Letter of Understanding regarding qualifying for a position. The Letter of Understanding was effective April 1, 1993.
On April 6, 1993 the Purchasing agent wrote the Claimant advising him that there was no merit to the claim of unjust treatment. In the last paragraph of the letter, the Purchasing Agent wrote:
The record reveals that Claimant is free to attempt to qualify on any position in the Department, including Position No. 263.
The Organization sought a remedy seeking pay for all time lost. The record is void of any evidence that the Claimant lost time as a result of the Carrier's action. It is also void of any evidenced that the Claimant made any effort to accept the Carrier Officer's invitation to attempt to qualify on any position in the Department.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the record clearly reveals that the Organization agreed with the Carrier in January 1993 that the Claimant should, at that time, be disqualified from Position No. 263. This Board finds that the Carrier did not violate the Agreement under these particular facts and circumstances, as the Claimant was not disqualified from all positions in the Purchases and Materials Department.
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.