The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Marty E. Zusman when award was rendered.
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
At issue is whether the controlling Agreement was violated when the Carrier unilaterally rebulletined a position with rest days of Monday and Tuesday. Before the Board, the organization asserts that the Carrier violated Rules 15, 17 and 18, but the Board finds nothing on property related to Rule 18. The focus on property was Rule 15. Form 1 Award No. 31471
The record demonstrates that this was a five day position. There is nothing in this record to support the coverage of this position for seven days. Nor can this Board find any record of a position with which the Claimant was staggered in order to create seven day coverage. Claimant is the only employee on this territory with no one assigned to cover his rest days.
This section states that the position herein disputed with its five day coverage must be conferenced. The record on property documents no attempt by the Carrier to discuss with the Organization the asserted operational problem or changed rest days. This leaves the Board no alterative except to sustain the claim for lack of an attempt to meet with the organization prior to initiating the change in rest days.
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) be made. The Carrier is ordered to make the Award effective on or before 30 days following the postmark date the Award is transmitted to the parties.