Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 31666
Docket No. MW-31214
96-3-93-3-200
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
Robert Richter when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(SOO Line Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier assigned other than
Track Subdepartment forces (Volkmann Railroad Builders) to
perform Track Subdepartment work (construct approximately four
thousand two-hundred feet of trackage) along the Carrier's
mainline at Leaf River, Illinois on August 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15,
16, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27 and 28, 1991 (System File C-21-91C090-09/8-00074 CMP).
(2) The Agreement was further violated when Carrier failed to furnish
the General Chairman with advance written notice of its intention
to contract out the work mentioned in Part (1) as required by Rule
1.
(3) The claim* as presented by General Chairman M.S. Wimmer on
January 20, 1992 to Vice President-Labor Relations C.S.
Frankenberg shall be allowed because said claim was not disallowed
by Vice President-Labor Relations C.S. Frankenberg within the
required sixty (60) day time limit set forth in Rule 47.
(4) As a consequence of the violations referred to in Parts (1), (2)
and/or (3) above, Messrs. S.P. Themas, E. Valladares, D.R.
Hartman and S.M. Smith shall each be compensated one hundred
forty-four (144) hours' pay at their respective straight time rates of
pay for the time worked by the outside forces on the dates listed
above."
Form 1 Award No. 31666
Page 2 Docket No. MW-31214
96-3-93-3-200
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved
herein.
Parties to said dispute waived right of appearance at hearing thereon.
The Carrier had leased property to Rail Rock Incorporated at Leaf River,
Illinois. Rail Rock contracted with Volkman Railroad Builders to build an industrial
spur track.
On September 30, 1991, the Organization filed a claim based on Volkman
performing work belonging to Soo Line employees. On November 25, 1991, the
Carrier's Division Manager declined the claim. The General Chairman alleges the
declination was not received until December 2, 1991.
On January 20, 1992, the claim was appealed to the Carrier's Vitt resident of
Labor Relations claiming a time limit violation as well as a violation of the Agreement
for allegedly contracting out its work.
It has advanced the time limit argument to this Board. Rule 47 of the Argument
reads as follows:
"RULE 47
TIME LIMIT - CLAIMS OR GRIEVANCES
1. All claims or grievances shall be handled as follows:
Form 1 Award
No. 31666
Page
3
Docket
No. MW-31214
96-3-93-3-200
(a) All claims or grievances must be presented in writing by or
on behalf of the employe involved, to the officer of the
Carrier authorized to receive same, within
60
days from the
date of the occurrence on which the claim or grievance is
based.
Should any such claim or grievance be disallowed, the
Carrier shall, within 60 days from the date same is filed,
notify whoever filed the claim or grievance (the employe or
his representative) in writing of the reasons for such
disallowance. If not so notified, the claim or grievance shall
be allowed as presented, but this shall not be considered as a
precedent or waiver of the contentions of the Carrier as to
other similar claims or grievances."
The Carrier argues that the Division Manager's declination was timely. The
record is clear that the declination was within 60 days from the date the claim as filed.
The Agreement does not require that the declination be received within 60 days. The
time limit was not violated.
As to the merits of the case, the Organization has not presented any evidence that
the Carrier contracted out any work. In fact, the Carrier has presented evidence that
Rail Rock reimbursed the Carrier for expenses it incurred connecting the industrial
track to the main line.
The Organization has the burden to prove the Agreement has been violated It
has failed to meet its burden. The Carrier has shown that industries have historically
installed their own tracks.
AWARD
Claim denied.
Form 1 Award No.
31666
Page
4
Docket No.
MW-31214
96-3-93-3-200
ORDER
The Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that
an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago,
Illinois, this 29th
day of August 1996.