Form I NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 31836
Docket No. MW-31471
96-3-93-3-471
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
Gerald E. Wallin when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Pacific Railroad Company (former
( Missouri Pacific Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier assigned an outside
contractor (M&M Construction Company) to perform Maintenance of
Way work (remove and repair crossing) at Mile Post 4.25, Abilene, Texas
beginning March 11, 1992 and continuing.
(2) The Carrier also violated Article IV of the May 17, 1968 National
Agreement when it failed to furnish the General Chairman with proper
advance written notice of its intention to contract out the work referred to
in Part (1) above.
(3) As a consequence of the violations referred to in Parts (1) and/or (2)
above, Foreman R. J. Little, Machine Operators J. L. Stutts, R. G. Maples
and J. N. Hollowell shall each be compensated, at their respective rates of
pay, for an equal proportionate share of the total number of man-hours
expended by the contractor's forces beginning May 11, 1992 and
continuing until the project is completed."
FINDING&
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
approved June 21,1934.
Form 1 Award No. 31836
Page 2 Docket No. MW-31471
96-3-93-3-471
This Division
of
the Adjustment Board bas jurisdiction over the dispute involved
herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice
of
hearing thereon.
Although several issues were raised by the parties' on-property assertions, one
Carrier defense must be addressed as a threshold matter. In its November 3, 1992
response to the Organization, Carrier said its "... records do not reflect
any
work was
performed by M&M Contracting anywhere around the Abilene, Texas area." (Boldface
in original.) With this material fact being placed in dispute by the Carrier, it was
incumbent upon the Organization to provide sufficient evidence to show that, in fact,
some work was done by contractor forces on the date and at the place alleged in the
claim. No such evidence was provided.
It is well settled that the Organization has the burden
of
proving all material facts
necessary to establish a prima facie claim. On this record, the Organization has not
satisfied that burden.
AWARD
Claim denied.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration
of
the dispute identified above, hereby orders that
an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 26th day of December 1996.