Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 31956
Docket No. SG-31201
97-3-94-3-631

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee James E. Mason when award was rendered.


PARTIES TO DISP IT
(Chicago and North Western Railway Company

STATEMENT OF .AIM:



FINS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and an the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute ace respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Form 1 Page 2

Award No. 31956
Docket No. SG-32201
97-3-94-3-631



The issue in this case concerns the agreed-upon rates of pay which are applicable to Assistant Signalmen during their periods of training in their progression to Signalman status. The dispute centers around the language and application of Agreement Rules 47 and 50, as well as agreed-upon Appendix "O." To permit a clear understanding of the issues here involved, the text of the Rules and Appendix "O" are reproduced in their entiretv.


"Rule 47 - ASSISTANT SIGNAL EN

(a) Assistant signalmen are employees in training to become signalmen


The period of training will be 24 months divided into 4 segments of 6 months each. %.hich will establish four advancing levels of trainee proficiency. The training program will combine home study, formal instruction. and on-the-job training, and will cover all phases of signal work. including signal shop work.


Step rates of pay will apply during such 4 segments
each, as follows:

lst segment - 87°/a of signalman's rate
2nd segment - 88% of signalman's rate
3rd segment - 89% of signalman's rate
4th segment - 90°/a of signalman's rate

of 6 months




Form 1 Page 3

Award No. 31956
DOl.ket No. SG-32201
97-3-94-3-631

(c) Assistants may be required to transfer from point to point not more









NW: See Rule 31(a) concerning seniority."

"Rule 50 - RATE OF PAY

The following rates are those in effect on January 1, 1985 and are subject to future wage adjustments and COLA.

Classification

District Signal Foreman
Crew Foreman - (Including
Signal Shop Foreman)
Signal Inspector (Testman)
Signal Electronic Technician
Leading Signal Maintainer
Leading Signalman
Signal Maintainer
Autogenous Welder Signalman
Signalman
Assistant Signalman and
Maintainer

1st six months
2nd six months
3rd six months
4th six months

Monthly Mgnthjy Houri~
flours fouls

232.7 53,094.08

$15.03
14.96
14.36
13.96
13.70
13.66
13.37
13.26

11.69
11.80
11.90
12.07
Form 1 Award No. 31956
Page 4 Docket No. SG-32201
97-3-94-3-631




MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CHICAGO AND NORTH WESTERN TRANSPORTATION

COMPANY AND THE BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN

PROVIDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A TRAINING

PROGRAM FOR SIGNAL EMPLOYEES









Form 1 Award No. 31956
Page 5 Docket No. SG-32201
97-3-94-3-631
6. Employees will be compensated at their regular straight time rate
of pay while attending classes. Should one of the National Holidays
specified in the Signalmen's Agreement occur during a session on a
day which would normally be a work day for the employee(s) they
shall choose a mutually acceptable alternate date. The Carrier win
to the a:tent possible schedule classes in weeks that do not include
National Holidays.
Note: Training will not be scheduled on Labor Day, Thanksgiving,
Christmas Eve or Christmas Day, nor on New Years Day.
When training includes any other holiday, the agreement
should reflect training status on straight time pay for that
day, plus the aforementioned alternate day off at sometime
after that training period is completed.
7. While an employee in the training program is not attending formal
classes, approximately five hours during regular working hours
each work week will be devoted to practical on-the-job instructions.
8. There will be an examination for each six mouth period, such
examination to be restricted to material covered during that period.
This examination. to be given under the direction of the Carrier,
may be a combination of written and oral questions as well as
questions on practical situations with a 75% grade being required
to pass the test. A demonstration of ability to perform practical
application of signal work will also be required of all trainees.
Organization representatives will be permitted to observe
examinations and/or classroom sessions.
9. If an employee falls the first examination in any period, he will be
given an opportunity within sixty days to take the examination a
second time. An employee who fails the examination a second time
will forfeit all seniority rights and have his service terminated.
This provision supersedes the qualification and discipline rules
contained in the Signalmen's Agreement.
Form 1 Award No. 31956
Page 6 Docket No. SG-32201
97-3-94-3-631















Form I Award No. 31956
Page 7 Docuet No. SG-32201


The instant dispute had its origin in a grievance presented by the Organization in January 1994, on behalf of the named Claimant alleging that, following his employment as an Assistant Signalman on May 18, 1992, his Assistant Signalman rate of pay should have progressed on a 6-month calendar basis resulting in his receiving the 4th segment pay rate specified in Rule 47 beginning on November 18, 1993. During the on-property progression of the dispute, the Organization contended that Rule 47, as well as Appendix "O", at Paragraph No. 4 thereof, specifically provides for four 6-month segments for the step rate progressions as well as for the training periods of Assistant Signalmen.


For its part. Carrier insisted that the 6-month periods of training and progressive compensation contemplated more than just the passage of a calendar period. Carrier argued that the 6-month periods of training and resultant pay rate increases demanded the actual performance of service either in classroom training or in on-the-job work performance by the Assistant Signalman. Carrier pointed out that, in this case, Claimant performed only minimal service during some of the calendar months and that, when he had performed the equivalent of six months service, his rate of pay was adjusted. Carrier referred the Board to the language of Rule 50 - RATE OF PAY which identifies "130 days of service" as the measure of a 6-month period. Carrier additionally contended that "since the inception of this agreement" it has historically and without objection from the Organization applied the 6-montb step rates on the basis of 130 days of service in the same manner as was applied in this case.


From the Board's review of the applicable Rules and after considering the respective arguments of the parties, it fords it inescapable that the fundamental purposes of the training program and the attendant pay progression provisions are to provide the Assistant Signalman with adequate training and work experience in the craft to permit the employee to successfully complete the training regimen. Examinations are required "for each six month period" (Paragraph 8, Appendix "0"). Clearly, calendar months in which the employee performs only limited or no actual service would have no meaning to the employee at the time of the 6-month periodic examination demanded by the Agreement.


While the language construction of Rule 47 may not be as clear in its meaning of a 6-month period as would be desired, and with the recognition by the Board of the separate and distinct applicability of Rule 47 versus Rule 50, the totality of the training program concept and the attendant pay rate adjustments as the training progresses

Form 1 Award No. 31956
Page 8 Docket No. SG-32201
97-3-94-3-631

convinces the Board that the .Assistant Signalman must under Rule 47 and Appendix "O" perform six months of service in the respective step rates before becoming. eligible for advancement to the next step rate. When this conclusion is coupled with the more than ten years of unchallenged application by the Carrier of the 130 days of service as a measure of a 6-month period, it becomes abundantly clear that this was the intent of the parties. Therefore, the claim as advanced in this dispute is denied.


                        .AWARD


      Claim denied.


                        ORDER


This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.


                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of March 1997.