The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Edwin H. Bean when award was rendered.
(United Steelworkers of America, Local Union 3263 PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
After Investigation conducted on February 16,1995, Claimant, a Yard Clerk with approximately 25 years of service, was assessed a 30 day suspension by letter dated February 27, 1995 for violation of the General Notice, Rules A, B, D and 1105 of the Book of Rules and Instructions when Claimant picked up and dropped a lunch table a number of times resulting in an injury to another employee sitting at the table. The Form I Award No. 31980
Carrier subsequently reduced the out of service portion of the suspension to ten days, but maintained the entire 30 day suspension on Claimant's record.
On January 29, 1995, Conductor J. Huether informed Supervisor G. Wilson that his shoulder was bothering him as a result of Claimant lifting and dropping a table Huether was sitting at. .according to Huether:
Substantial evidence exists in the record to support the Carrier's determination
that Claimant engaged in the misconduct as charged. Claimant's version of the incident
that he tripped (which was contrary to what he told Supervisor Wilson) was not credited
in the Carrier's determination to issue discipline. It is not the function of this Board to
reverse credibility determinations unless clearly justified by the record. The record does
not provide 2 basis for doing so in this case. Instead, the record supports the conclusion
Form 1 Award No. 31980that Claimant engaged in horseplay when he lifted and dropped the table at which Huether was sitting.
The amount of discipline imposed is not arbitrary or capricious. Claimant had a prior ten day suspension for causing damage to a computer keyboard by striking it with his fist. A ten day actual and 30 day record suspension for this misconduct is not excessive.
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.