Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 32016
Docket No. MW-32591
97-3-95-3-529

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Nancy F. Murphy when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIA1:





FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, rinds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.
Form 1 Award No. 32016

Page 2 Docket No. MW-32591
97-3-95-3-529

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




S. D. Jones, seniority date September 18, 1978, is employed by Carrier as a Truck Driver. Claimant was working in that capacity, under the supervision of Section Gang Foreman A. Weaver and Roadmaster M. Theret when this dispute arose.


During the weeks prior to July 26, 1994, Foreman Weaver had approached Roadmaster Theret with concerns about Claimant's "unsafe" driving habits. The Roadmaster cautioned Foreman Weaver, that he could not "just say that someone is unsafe" and that it would be necessary to "be more specific with facts and dates" should the situation persist In the meantime, however, the Roadmaster instructed the Foreman to "talk" to Mr. Jones, and "explain to him how to drive in a safe manner."













Form 1 Award No. 32016
Page 3 Docket No. iVIW-32591
97-3-95-3-529
Thurs. July 14th, 12:35 p.m.










On August 2,1994, Claimant was instructed to attend an Investigation scheduled for August 10, 1994, to:
Form 1 Xward No. 32016
Page 4 Docket No. NIW-32591
97-3-95-3-529



On August 7, 1994, the Local Chairman sent the following correspondence to Roadmaster Underwood, concerning Claimant's Investigation:





The Investigation was duly postponed and held on August 16,1994. At the outset, the Organization again raised ill timeliness objection, however the Investigation was convened Foreman Weaver and Roadmaster 17teret testified on behalf of Carrier, while Mr. Jones' co-workers, Truck Driver Jennings and Assistant Foreman Norman testified
Form 1 Award No. 32016
Page 5 Docket No. MW-32591


at Claimant's behest. Neither of the witnesses was able to corroborate the incidents of alleged "unsafe driving", described by Foreman Weaver, prior to July 22, 1994. It is noted, however, that Mr. Jennings candidly admitted partial responsibility for the July 22 incident collision with the stack of panels. Specifically, Mr. Jennings conceded that Claimant had requested his help in directing the back-up movement, but because it was "too hot", Mr. Jennings instead sought shelter under a nearby overpass, leaving Claimant to back up without direction.


On September 1, 1994, Carrier notified Claimant that as a result of "violating General Safety Rule 1", an entry of censure and a live day suspension from service, had been placed in his personal record.


The Organization appealed the decision, maintaining that the assessed discipline "clearly" violated the Agreement. In further support of Carrier's alleged violation of Rule 40, the Organization pointed to Mr. Weaver's testimony in which he stated that he "thought" he spoke to Roadmaster Theret regarding Claimant's "unsafe" driving on July 19, 1994. However, when questioned as to whether that was the first occasion upon which he had spoken to the Roadmaster regarding Claimant's driving habits, Foreman Weaver stated that he had first raised the subject with the Roadmaster "about 3 1\2 years ago." Finally, noting the time limit exception provided for in Section B of Rule 40, the General Chairman stated that the case in dispute "certainly" did not constitute a personal conduct violation.


Regarding the merits of the dispute, Carrier denied the claim, maintaining that Claimant "continually failed" to safely execute the duties of his position as truck driver between July 1 and July 22,1994. Carrier further stated that the discipline assessed was "appropriate and well measured."


Referring to the issue of timeliness, Carrier maintained that it became "officially aware" of Mr. Jones "unacceptable driving habit" when Roadmaster Tlheret received Mr. Weaver's letter dated July 26, 1994. Prior to that date, any interchange between Foreman Weaver and Roadmaster Tlheret was "idle conversation." It was only after "careful consideration" Carrier determined that an investigation was necessary, and, accordingly, Carrier notified Claimant by letter dated August 6, 1994, "seven (7) days after the date of first knowledge."

Form 1 Award No. 32016
Page 6 Docket No. M`V-32591


The Organization's premise that Carrier exceeded the requisite time limits is well founded on this record. The time limits for scheduling the investigation into the alleged incidents of July 13 and 1-t, began to run on July 19, 1994, when Foreman Weaver reported those occurrences to Roadmaster Tlreret. The hearing scheduled for August 10, 1994, fell clearly outside Rule 40 time limits. With respect to the July 13 and 14 events, and that lack of timeliness. cannot be cured by the device of tagging those incidents onto the July 22, 1994 allegation which first was reported to Roadmaster Theret on July 26, 1994. Therefore, the hearing of August 10 was untimely and invalid with respect to July 13 and 14, 1994, and discipline based thereon must be dismissed.


With the respect to July 22. 1994 incident, Claimant must be considered partially culpable for backing into and damaging the panels. However, his culpability is mitigated by the contributory negligence of Mr. Jennings. Based upon all of the foregoing, we find that the discipline assessed by Carrier must be reduced from a suspension without pay, to a Letter of Reprimand, referencing solely the incident of July 22, 1994, and deleting all references to alleged "unsafe driving" prior to that date.


                        AWARD


      Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.


                        ORDE


T1is Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) be made. The Carrier is ordered to make the Award effective on or before 30 days following the postmark date the Award is transmitted to the parties.


                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 6th day of May 1997.