The Claimant is a regularly assigned Signal Maintainer with approximately 16 years of service with Carrier. On October 16, 1994, Carrier's Engine No. 62 received authority to move through South Yard which involved passing through a number of signals and power switches. As the engine was completing its movement, the power switch at CP 169 realigned against the movement. The switches at CP 169 are in Claimant's assigned territory.
Investigation was held as scheduled, and on November 3, 1994, Carrier advised Claimant that his record had been assessed with 20 days actual suspension for failure to properly perform your duties "when power switch numbers 8 and 10 (CP 169) realigned."
Claimant's suspension was appealed by the Organization to Carrier's highest designated officer to receive such appeals but was unable to reach satisfactory resolution of the dispute. Claim is now properly before this Board for adjudication. Form i Award No. 32181
Study of the Investigation transcript convinces this Board that Carrier failed to prove with substantial evidence its charges that Claimant failed to properly perform his duties.
Carrier asserts that Claimant failed to properly perform maintenance, but nowhere in the record before this Board does it indicate that any problems were experienced with switches 8 and 10 (CP 169) prior to the incident on October 16, 1994. Further, the record contains no evidence of Claimant performing any work to switches 8 and 10 (CP 169) immediately prior to the incident on October 16, 1994. Accordingly, the assertion of improper wiring by Claimant is shown to be without merit.
The record before the Board does reveal that Claimant was negligent in filing his monthly and quarterly test reports. The record also reveals that Carrier's Signal Maintenance Foreman was also negligent in not requiring Claimant to file his monthly and quarterly test reports on time.
In the Investigation, Claimant testified that he had made the required tests but just did not write them up and file them. Further, he testified that he had notes in his truck on the switches tested on which he had to file reports.
The record does not reveal that Carrier took issue with Claimant's testimony or pursued further the question of whether Claimant had performed the required monthly and quarterly test. Accordingly, this Board concludes that Carrier was satisfied that the required tests were performed.
The claim will be sustained, but Claimant is put on notice that his monthly and quarterly test reports must be timely filed. Failure to do so will be at his peril.
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that au award favorable to the Claimant(s) be made. The Carrier is ordered to make the Award effective on or before 30 days following the postmark date the Award is transmitted to the parties.