Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 32349
Docket No. MW-31891
97-3-94-3-169

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Marty E. Zusman when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:





Form 1 Award No. 32349
Page 2 Docket No. iMW-31891


FINDINGS :

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




The Carrier contracted out steel construction work which was performed by employees of Prairie Construction Company over seventeen days. In that time frame, the outside contractor worked at the Water Treatment Facility in Council Bluffs, Iowa and erected a steel building. The Organization argues that the work performed was typical work of erecting steel columns, sheeting, attaching doors, windows and finishing. The Organization argues that this work was contracted out in violation of Rule 52 and the Scope Rule, as the work performed belonged to the employees. Specifically, the B&B Subdepartment Steel Erection employees have customarily and traditionally performed such work which was clearly contained within Rule 8. The assignment of Scope protected work to employees foreign to the Agreement without written notice was clearly a violation of the negotiated Agreement.


Numerous additional issues and argument are raised throughout this claim by the Organization in support of its position. This Board has carefully studied all of the arguments and the Carrier's detailed denials. We have reviewed the supporting documents, letters, pictures and Awards cited by both parties in this dispute. Notwithstanding all of the materials, the basic elements to support the claim were not found. The Board has studied the Agreement language and finds that the Scope Rule is a general Scope Rule. There is nothing in Rule 8 that provides exclusivity to the employees of this disputed work. Nor is there proof of system wide exclusivity. The Carrier provided sufficient evidence that contracting out of this instant work was practice on the property. The Board finds the Carrier's evidence compelling and thereby

Form 1 Award No. 32349
Page 3 Docket No. MW-31891


covered by Rule 52, which permits the Carrier to continue such practice. Under the full record of this case the Agreement was not violated.



      Claim denied.


                        ORDER


This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.

                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of November 1997.