Form I NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 32423
Docket No. MW-32147
98-3-94-3-559

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Edwin H. Benn when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Seaboard ( System Railroad Company)

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:





FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Form I Award No. 32423
Page 2 Docket No. MW-32147
98-3-94-3-559



Claimant is assigned to the 6XT2 System Production Gang as a Truck Driver. The Carrier made a truck available for delivery of ice and water to the gang. A CDL was not required for driving that truck. The Carrier offered the job of obtaining ice and water (which involved overtime) to a senior employee who refused the work. Following seniority, the Carrier then offered the work to another employee on the gang - D. L. Sanders, a Machine Operator - who accepted. Sanders was senior to Claimant, but not in terms of Truck Driver seniority. This claim followed asserting that Claimant's Truck Driver seniority was not honored.





The Organization has not carried its burden. The truck did not require a CDL. Any gang member with an operator's license could therefore operate the truck. Rule 7(B) requires "the senior qualified employee in the System Gang indicating a desire to work overtime" to get the work. After the work was refused by a more senior employee, the Carrier offered the work to Machine Operator Sanders who was senior to Claimant. Sanders was qualified to do the work. Rule 7(B) was not violated.





Form 1 Award No. 32423
Page 3 Docket No. MW-32147
98-3-94-3-559



This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.



                      Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of January 1998.