Form I NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 32502
Docket No. CL-32996
98-3-96-3-383
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
James E. Conway when award was rendered.
(Transportation Communications International Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Illinois Central Railroad
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim of the System Committee of the Organization (GL-11232) that:
1. Carrier violated the Agreement between the Parties when on July
9, 1995, it failed to call Clerk B. G. Barclay, Centralia, Illinois, to
fill a short vacancy on Position No. 1951 thereby violating Rules 9,
33, The Guarantee Extra Board Agreement, and others of the
Clerks Agreement.
2. Carrier shall now be required to compensate the Claimant eight
hours at the time and one-half rate amounting to S 197.7.1."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor :kct, as
approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved
herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
Form 1 Award No. 32502
Page 2 Docket No. CL-32996
98-3-96-3-383
The Parties are in agreement on the pertinent facts. On Wednesday, July 5, 1995
Clerk E. W. Fizer commenced a scheduled vacation from Position No. 1951 at Centralia,
Illinois. That position entailed regular hours of 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. with Mondays
and Tuesdays off. Clerk B. H. Barclay, incumbent of Position No. 7012 on the
Guaranteed Extra Board at Centralia, was called to work Fizer's shift on July 5, and
worked it again on July 6 and 7. Barclay previously had filled vacancies on Position
1954-4 on July 3 and 4, and thus by Friday evening, July 7, had worked five eight-hour
shifts on Positions 1954-4 and 1951.
On Sunday, July 9, Carrier called in Clerk J. W. Cragen from a day of rest to
work Fizer's shift. On July 19, the Organization presented a claim for eight hours at
time and one-half alleging that Carrier had violated Rule 9, Filling Short Vacancies,
when it failed to use Claimant to work Fizer's regular shift on that date in lieu of
Cragen. Carrier asserts that the Claimant was not entitled under Rule 9 to fill the
vacancy on Position 1951 on July 9. The relevant provisions of Rule 9 are as follows:
"ARTICLE 1X- FILLING SHORT VACANCIES
Rule 9 of the Schedule Agreement is amended to read as follows:
(b) When short vacancies (including vacation vacancies) occur or a
position is vacant pending bulletin, it may be filled or blanked.
(c) If the company elects to fill the position by calling an additional
employee, the procedures described in paragraphs (d) or (e) will apply.
(d) In filling short vacancies as specified above, the following procedure
shall be used:
(i) By the senior qualified extra employee who is available at the
pro rata rate. Extra employees will not be used for service at
points other than their headquarters points, unless they have
made written request to be called in line with their seniority for
vacancies at other specified locations. An extra employee is
considered `available' for one full tour of dutv on each calendar
Form I Award No. 32502
Page 3 Docket No. CL-32996
98-3-96-3-383
day provided the second tour of duty commences not less than
sixteen hours from the previous starting time. An extra employee
called for service between sixteen and twenty hours from his last
starting time has the privilege of declining such service.
(ii) By the senior qualified regular assigned employee in the same
office or facility who desires to fill the vacancy. Such employees
will not be permitted to begin work on the vacancies on either of
the rest days of their regular positions. If the vacancy is less than
five working days, the employees may return to their regular
positions at the expiration of the vacancy. If the vacancy is of five
or more days duration the employee must observe the rest days of
the vacant position during and at the end of the vacancy. The
employee filling the vacancy must remain thereon for its duration
unless displaced through the exercise of seniority or assigned to
another position by bulletin.
(iii) If on a regular relief assignment, by the regular incumbent
on the same shift who fills the position five days a week.
(iv) The senior available qualified regularly assigned employee off
duty.
(v) The senior qualified extra employee available at time and one
half rate."
The Organization maintains in its Submission that Carrier called Clerk Cragen
to fill Position 1951 on both Saturday, July 8 and Sunday, July 9, and violated Rules 9
and 33 by doing so. Its original claim, however, is confined to eight hours pay for July
9, and alleges only a Rule 9 violation. Accordingly, because the Board is required to
limit its review to matters raised in case handling on the property, we must disregard
the inclusion of the July 8 date and the Rule 33 contention as improper expansions of the
claim.
The Board finds that Clerk Barclay, having filled Fizer's shift on Wednesday,
Thursday and Friday after doing two earlier turns that week on Position 195:1-4, had
completed his 40 hours for the week from his Extra Board assignment. Because
Form 1 Award No. 32502
Page 4 Docket No. CL-32996
98-3-96-3-383
Claimant Barclay began and ended his workweek by filling positions from the Extra
Board, and not by assignment to fill a position for a five day vacation period, Rule 9 (d)
(iii) had no application to him on Sunday, July 9 - a day undeniably part of Fizer's
regular assignment, not part of a relief assignment. Under the circumstances presented
here, Clerk Cragen, the senior available employee regularly assigned to the position and
off duty on the disputed date, was properly called on a regular day of rest to
rill
Position
1951 at the time and one-half rate under Rule 9 (d) (iv).
AWARD
Claim denied.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that
an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of March 1998.