Form I NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 32502
Docket No. CL-32996
98-3-96-3-383

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee James E. Conway when award was rendered.

(Transportation Communications International Union PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:












FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor :kct, as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.


Form 1 Award No. 32502
Page 2 Docket No. CL-32996
98-3-96-3-383

The Parties are in agreement on the pertinent facts. On Wednesday, July 5, 1995 Clerk E. W. Fizer commenced a scheduled vacation from Position No. 1951 at Centralia, Illinois. That position entailed regular hours of 3:00 P.M. to 11:00 P.M. with Mondays and Tuesdays off. Clerk B. H. Barclay, incumbent of Position No. 7012 on the Guaranteed Extra Board at Centralia, was called to work Fizer's shift on July 5, and worked it again on July 6 and 7. Barclay previously had filled vacancies on Position 1954-4 on July 3 and 4, and thus by Friday evening, July 7, had worked five eight-hour shifts on Positions 1954-4 and 1951.


On Sunday, July 9, Carrier called in Clerk J. W. Cragen from a day of rest to work Fizer's shift. On July 19, the Organization presented a claim for eight hours at time and one-half alleging that Carrier had violated Rule 9, Filling Short Vacancies, when it failed to use Claimant to work Fizer's regular shift on that date in lieu of Cragen. Carrier asserts that the Claimant was not entitled under Rule 9 to fill the vacancy on Position 1951 on July 9. The relevant provisions of Rule 9 are as follows:









Form I Award No. 32502
Page 3 Docket No. CL-32996
98-3-96-3-383
day provided the second tour of duty commences not less than
sixteen hours from the previous starting time. An extra employee
called for service between sixteen and twenty hours from his last
starting time has the privilege of declining such service.
(ii) By the senior qualified regular assigned employee in the same
office or facility who desires to fill the vacancy. Such employees
will not be permitted to begin work on the vacancies on either of
the rest days of their regular positions. If the vacancy is less than
five working days, the employees may return to their regular
positions at the expiration of the vacancy. If the vacancy is of five
or more days duration the employee must observe the rest days of
the vacant position during and at the end of the vacancy. The
employee filling the vacancy must remain thereon for its duration
unless displaced through the exercise of seniority or assigned to
another position by bulletin.
(iii) If on a regular relief assignment, by the regular incumbent
on the same shift who fills the position five days a week.
(iv) The senior available qualified regularly assigned employee off
duty.
(v) The senior qualified extra employee available at time and one
half rate."

The Organization maintains in its Submission that Carrier called Clerk Cragen to fill Position 1951 on both Saturday, July 8 and Sunday, July 9, and violated Rules 9 and 33 by doing so. Its original claim, however, is confined to eight hours pay for July 9, and alleges only a Rule 9 violation. Accordingly, because the Board is required to limit its review to matters raised in case handling on the property, we must disregard the inclusion of the July 8 date and the Rule 33 contention as improper expansions of the claim.


The Board finds that Clerk Barclay, having filled Fizer's shift on Wednesday, Thursday and Friday after doing two earlier turns that week on Position 195:1-4, had completed his 40 hours for the week from his Extra Board assignment. Because

Form 1 Award No. 32502
Page 4 Docket No. CL-32996
98-3-96-3-383

Claimant Barclay began and ended his workweek by filling positions from the Extra Board, and not by assignment to fill a position for a five day vacation period, Rule 9 (d) (iii) had no application to him on Sunday, July 9 - a day undeniably part of Fizer's regular assignment, not part of a relief assignment. Under the circumstances presented here, Clerk Cragen, the senior available employee regularly assigned to the position and off duty on the disputed date, was properly called on a regular day of rest to rill Position 1951 at the time and one-half rate under Rule 9 (d) (iv).








This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.


                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of March 1998.