Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 32526
Docket No. CMS-32848
98-3-96-3-191

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Elizabeth C. Wesman when award was rendered.

(T. R. Jensen PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:



FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, rinds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.


Form 1 Award No. 32526
Page 2 Docket No. MS-32848
98-3-96-3-191

The instant case involves a dispute over the application of Appendix D, Article IX and X of the Agreement between the Parties. At the time the dispute arose, Claimant was employed in the Carrier's Materials Department in Council Bluffs, Iowa. On October 8, 1992, Claimant's position at Council Bluffs was abolished. On October 12, 1992, Claimant displaced to Marshalltown, Iowa. He began work in that new position on October 19, 1992. At or about the same time, Claimant applied for the 5500.00 transfer allowance available under Article IX-B of the Agreement. He later applied for the real estate benefits under Articles IX and X, on November 2, 1992. While employed at Marshalltown, Claimant took a three week vacation from October 26, 1992, through November 13, 1992. Claimant was displaced from the Marshalltown position on December 4, 1992, subsequently displaced a Yard Clerk job at Fremont, Nebraska.





Form l Award No. 32526
Page 3 Docket No. MS-32848
98-3-96-3-191




Claimant's request for the $500.00 allowance was paid by the Carrier. However, his request for the real estate benefit was declined. During processing on the property, the Carrier contended that working in Marshalltown for two three week periods did not constitute a relocation as contemplated by the TCU/CNW Agreement. The CNW also pointed out that Claimant had worked in Marshalltown only approximately 18 days. They referred Claimant to Public Law Board No. 4848, Award 31, which held that failure to establish a primary residence in a new location failed to meet the principal criterion necessary for benefits awarded under Articles IX and X. The Organization concurred with the Carrier in its determination. Subsequently, Claimant elected to pursue the matter ex parte.


The instant case is not identical to the matter at issue in Award 31 of Public Law Board No. 4848. In that case the Board found that the Claimant had not ceased "living" at his original residence. In the instant case, while Claimant "lived" at his new location, he did not have to change his primary residence, or move his household goods and his family from Council Bluffs to Marshalltown. Nor did Claimant "obtain shelter, on a continuing basis, at his new location." Rather, he spent a few days sharing an apartment with a co-worker, and the remaining days at a hotel. Accordingly, Claimant has not met the criteria set forth in Article IX. Therefore, he is not entitled to the real estate allowance provided in Attachment A, Section 5(a). For reasons not clear on this record, the Carrier elected to pay Claimant $500.00. Such payment does not constitute an admission by Carrier that Claimant is also entitled to the Article IX real estate benefits.

Form 1 Award No. 32526
Page 4 Docket No. MS-32848
98-3-96-3-191



      Claim denied.


                        ORDER


This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.

                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of March 1998.