Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 32533
Docket No. CL-33003
98-3-96-3-401

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Elizabeth C. Wesman when award was rendered.

(Transportation Communications International Union PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (former ( MidSouth Rail Corporation)

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:







FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.


Form 1 Award No. 32533
Page 2 Docket No. CL-33003
98-3-96-3-401

At the heart of this dispute is the application of Rules 16 and 19 of the Agreement between the Parties, which read in pertinent part as follows:








On September 12, 1994, a short vacancy existed on the position of Customer Service Representative at Jackson, Mississippi. The vacancy was for five weeks and was the result of the regular incumbent being on vacation. Carrier called a Vacation Relief Clerk senior to Claimant to fill the vacancy. Claimant also holds bulletin rights to the position of Vacation Relief Clerk and maintains that he should have been called for this vacancy because it was within his bulletin territory, and not within the other Clerk's territory.


A careful review of all the contract provisions cited by the Organization, including those portions reproduced above, fails to support the instant claim. While Rule 19 does, indeed, specify that bulletins "shall show territory or department included in the assignment," nothing in any of the Rules cited obligates Carrier to restrict itself to the double requirement of : (1) most senior employee and (2) an employee already assigned within the territory in awarding a vacation position. The Organization has not disputed that the employee awarded the position at issue in lieu of Claimant was, in fact,

Form 1 Award No. 32533
Page 3 Docket No. CL-33003
98-3-96-3-401

more senior to Claimant. Accordingly, the Carrier has complied with clear language of Rules 16 and 19.







This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.

                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of March 1998.