Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 32624
Docket No. MW-31233
98-3-93-3-155

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee John C. Fletcher when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (Southern Pacific Transportation Company ( (Eastern Lines)

STATEMENT OF CLAIM:















FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21. 1934.
Form 1 Award No. 32624
Page 2 Docket No. MW-31233
98-3-93-3-155

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




On February 10, 1992, the Carrier and Organization entered into a letter agreement establishing a position designated as Rail Train Supervisor. That letter agreement provided:






Mr. T. D. Galvan. the herein Claimant, bid on the newly established Rail Train Supervisor position. Galvan at the time. it is apparent from this record, possessed the "ability to operate, maintain and move the power and all ramp cars." Also, he possessed the "ability to train and supervise all loading and unloading of new and used rail, safely." These were the special qualifications. prerequisite for consideration for assignment agreed upon by the parties in the February 10. 1992 letter agreement. That agreement did not grant Carrier the privilege of assigning the job to the most qualified individual that applied. Nonetheless. Carrier gage the job to junior employee. Mr. M. G. Ramirez. Ill, on the stated contention that "he was the most qualified individual to supervise the train."

Form 1 Award No. 32624
Page 3 Docket No. MW-31233


The February 10, 1992 letter agreement did not provide that the most qualified individual would be assigned to the newly created Rail Train Supervisor position. The last paragraph of that agreement provided that assignment would be made in accordance with seniority, fitness and qualifications. It has not been established that Claimant did not possess the seniority, fitness and qualifications for the position. Furthermore the February 10, 1992 letter agreement cannot fairly be read that the parties intended that the job go to the most qualified applicant. Accordingly, the agreement was violated when Carrier selected a junior employee it believed to be most qualified for the position.










This Board. after consideration of the dispute identified above. hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimants) be made. The Carrier is ordered to make the award effective on or before 30 days following the postmark date the .award is transmitted to the parties.


                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 23rd day of June 1998.