Form I NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 32709
Docket No. MS-32801
98-3-95-3-588

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Jonathan S. Liebowitz when award was rendered.

(R. W. Raymond PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM :





FINDINGS :

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence. finds that:
Form l Award No. 32709
Page 2 Docket No. MS-32801


The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




The record shows that the Carrier employed the Claimant as a Track Foreman at Altoona. Pennsylvania, until November 11, 1994, when Carrier removed Claimant from service for his part in the theft and resale of electric traction motor coils from the Juniata Storehouse in Juniata, Pennsylvania, having a replacement value greater than 590,000.00. The record shows that Claimant actively participated in the theft of the coils during a period from April 1994 until October 1994 and that Claimant and his coconspirators sold the Investigation, on January 13, 1995, Claimant admitted his participation in the theft of the traction coils.


By Notice of Discipline dated January 31, 1995, Carrier dismissed Claimant from its service in all capacities. The Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes progressed the claim to the Carrier's Senior Director-Labor Relations. Following C'arrier's denial of the appeal. Claimant progressed the appeal to this Board on an individual basis. Ilv letter dated Julv 23, 1995, the Office of the District Attorney of Blair County, Pennsylvania, sent to Carrier a sentencing order, dated July 14, 1995, of the Court of Common Pleas of Blair County pursuant to a plea agreement, sentencing Claimant on a count of criminal conspiracy.


Our review of the Statement of Claim shows that it is a plea for leniency following the C'arrier's finding, and Claimant's admission, of theft from the Carrier. There is no question that such an act of dishonesty is a dismissable offense.





Form 1 Award No. 32709
Page 3 Docket No. MS-32801


      · Theft of Carrier's property constitutes dishonesty and as such is proper grounds for removal. See Third Division Award 21334.


      · The Statement of Claim constitutes a request for leniency. Such a request is not a proper matter for this Board's discretion. We find that the degree of discipline is consistent with the offense. See Second Division Award 12102.


                        .WARD


      Claim denied.


                        ORDER


This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above. hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.

                    NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT 130ARD

                    By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 19th day of August 1998.