' Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 32923
Docket No. TD-32851
98-3-96-3-188














Form 1 Award No. 32923
Page 2 Docket No. TD-32851


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




On June 15,1995 at 8:40 P.M., incumbent West Belt Dispatcher D. G. Masek laid off sick creating a vacancy for the first shift (7:00 A.M. - 3:00 P.M.) on Friday, June 16, 1995. The Carrier called General Chairman R. W. Filges at 8:54 P.M. on June 15,1995 to fill the position, which was refused. At 5:06 A.M. on June 16, 1995, J. H. Ward was called, with no answer. Claimant Hosp was working a third shift assignment and C. Volner was on vacation. The Carrier then blanked the June 16, 1995 West Belt Train Dispatcher position on the first shift and combined the West Belt and Merchants Train Dispatcher positions.










Form 1 Award No. 32923
Page 3 Docket No. TD-32851




This is not a case where the Carrier has an unfettered right to combine positions. Article 3(e) is clear that "[e]ach dispatcher's position shall be considered a `relief requirement'" and "[a]ny exception must be by Agreement between the management and the General Chairman." When the Carrier blanked theWestBeltTrainDispatcher position on the first shift and then combined the two positions on Friday June 16,1995, it did so on that day of the week without "Agreement between the management and the General Chairman" in violation of Article 3(e).




First, there is no reason expressed in the record developed on the property why Claimant Valdejo was not called. He is therefore entitled to the requested relief.


Second, even assuming as the Carrier argues that Claimant Hosp's working would have violated Hours of Service provisions, that fact does not preclude payment to him. "That [Hours of Service argument] is an affirmative defense to a prima facie violation of Article 4 (f) and we are not persuaded that Carrier has carried its burden of proof." Third Division Award 30454. The Carrier has not sufficiently shown why it would violate Hours of Service to require the Carrier to pay (not work) Claimant Hosp as a consequence of the Carrier's operating with a limited number of Dispatchers and an Agreement provision which requires "Agreement between the management and the General Chairman" to combine the positions in this case. To find otherwise would effectively allow a violation of the Agreement to go unremedied because the Carrier exercised a prerogative and chose to limit the number of available Dispatchers.


Third, this is not a case where there was a partial blanking of a position and no evidence that work of that blanked position was performed which could limit a remedy. See Award 30454. Here, the position was blanked for the entire shift. Had West Belt Dispatcher Masek not marked off sick, and without any evidence to the contrary, we must assume that he would have had a shift's worth of work to perform on June 16, 1995.

Form 1 Award No. 32923
Page 4 Docket No. TD-32851
98-3-96-3-188



      Claim sustained.


                          ORDER


This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) be made. The Carrier is ordered to make the Award effective on or before 30 days following the postmark date the Award is transmitted to the parties.


                        NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of Third Division


                        Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 23rd day of November 1998.