Form 1

NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION

Award No. 33508
Docket No. MS-34009
99-3-97-3-525

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Elizabeth C. Wesman when award was rendered.

PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:

(Douglas Harold Hartzell

"The National Railroad Passenger Corporation ordered other employees as well as myself to operate refrigerated Commercial Vehicles. In general, four complete transports of tobacco, alcohol, and miscellaneous freight were made per shift via Los Angeles Union Station to the Los Angeles Catering Services Department. The Carrier did violate the laws adhering in compliance with the Federal Code of Regulations, Chapter Forty-Nine (49).


Why did the National Railroad Passenger Corporation order employees to operate Commercial Vehicles, Class B, disregarding the State of California Department of Motor Vehicles' taxed written and performance exams required in compliance with the Federal Code of Regulations, Chapter Forty-Nine (49)?


REMEDY:

The following entities are to receive the following percentage of the total Remedy amount:


Remedy Amount: $2,117,000.00


Form 1 Page 2

FINDINGS:

Award No. 33508
Docket No. MS-34009
99-3-97-3-525



(2.) The State of California Police Activities League



(3.) Manhattan Beach Community Church



(4.) H. J. Scott



Transportation Communication Union consisting of AFL-CIO

Remedy: 35.5%

(6.) Redondo Beach Unified School District



The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved

herein.

Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
Form 1 Page 3

Award No. 33508
Docket No. MS-34009
99-3-97-3-525

After thorough review of the record the Board has determined this claim is outside the authority of its jurisdiction. The Claimant is not an employee of the Carrier, the claim does not involve a Rules violation, the Claimant alleges violations) of federal statutes and the Claimant seeks reinstatement. The Board takes note of the following Awards:

In Third Division Award 19926 the Board stated in part:

"... Claimant alleged violations of various Federal Statutes as well as a violation of the Merger Protective Agreement in this Claim. This Board is not empowered to interpret or enforce Federal Laws; its jurisdiction is limited to disputes coming under the Railway Labor Act . . . :'


Third Division Award 10963 also addressed this issue as follows:


The Board has no authority to grant the remedy Claimant seeks, nor does it have the authority to reinstate an employee dismissed without a possibility of return to service -- in accordance with the holding of a separate Special Board of Adjustment. Thus, the Board has no choice but to dismiss the claim.

AWARD

Claim dismissed.
Form 1 Page 4

Award No. 33508 __v
Docket No. MS-34009
99-3-97-3-525

ORDER

This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimants) not be made.

NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 22nd day of September 1999.