This claim involves the propriety of the Carrier's hiring of a new employee to assume the position of Motor Car Repairman (MCR) in the Scales and Work Equipment subdepartment, rather than the Claimant, a Roadway Machine Operator in the Track subdepartment, who bid on the January 30,1995 bulletin advertising the MCR position.
Rules 15 and 16 of the Agreement define the seniority rights of BMWE employees as confined to the subdepartment and group within which they work. There are three Subdepartments - Bridge and Building (B&B), Track and Scales and Work Equipment (S&WE). The MCR position in issue was in Group 2(c) of the S&WE Subdepartment. The Claimant was employed in Group 2(b) in the Track Subdepartment and held no seniority in the S&WE Subdepartment. The Carrier received no bids for the MCR position from employees within the S&WE or subgroup involved.
The issue herein deals with which of the following two sections of Rule 32, Assignments, applies in filling the instant vacancy:
The Organization argues that Rule 32(b) applies, and because no S&WE employees bid on the position, the Claimant should have been awarded the position prior to the Carrier hiring a new employee. It contends that the exception in Rule 32(b) is clearly limited to the rights of furloughed Machinists to fill vacancies in MCR positions, and because there were no such furloughed Machinists at the time of the bulletin, it does not apply. The Organization avers that, under Rule 29(a), the Claimant should have been afforded an opportunity to qualify for the MCR position after it was awarded. That Rule provides:
The Carrier initially contends that Rule 32(b) does not apply for two reasons. First, because MCR positions are specifically excepted from its coverage. Second, because the Claimant is not a qualified MCR, he would not be entitled to consideration even if no S&WE subdepartment employee bid on the posting. It notes that the method of filling MCR vacancies in Supplement 1 is not applicable because there were no furloughed Machinists at the time of the bulletin in issue.
The Carrier then argues that because Rule 32(b) does not apply, Rule 32(a) must govern as the method for filling the position. It asserts that such provision recognizes first the right of employees within in the same group and rank, next the right of Form 1 Award No. 35188
employees in the same group but lower rank, and lastly, other groups within the same subdepartment. The Carrier asserts that because the Claimant was not in the S&WE subdepartment, he has no rights to the MCR position under Rule 32(a), and it was entitled to hire a new employee.
The Carrier finally contends that, even if Rule 32(b) applied, the Claimant was not eligible for the MCR position because he was not qualified for such position. It disagrees that Rule 29(a) gives an unqualified employee the right to obtain a bid position and then a 30-day qualifying period to prove himself. Rather, it notes that on three separate occasions in Rule 32(b) it requires that non-S&WE bidders be qualified at the time of the bid, and argues that Rule 29(a) is intended to permit the Carrier the opportunity to test such qualification during a 30-day period.
A careful review of the record and language of the applicable Agreement provisions set forth above convinces the Board that the Carrier's argument has merit. Rule 32(b) clearly excludes the position of MCR in the S&WE subdepartment from its coverage. Further, even if it were applicable to the bulletined position herein, there is no contention that the Claimant was qualified to assume the MCR position at the time of his bid. Rule 32(b) makes clear that, if a vacancy or new position in the S&WE is to be filled by an employee holding seniority outside the group and rank of such position, that employee must be qualified on the position, whether employed in the S&WEoroutsidethatsubdepartment. The general qualifying period language of Rule 29(a) cannot be read to negate the specific qualification requirement within Rule 32(a) and (b).
Further, the Claimant would not be entitled to the bulletined position under Rule 32(a), if that is the applicable provision for filling the MCR vacancy in issue. That provision does not require the Carrier to go outside the subdepartment in which the vacancy occurs, here the S&WE, prior to hiring a new employee. Because the Claimant held seniority only within the Track subdepartment, he had no rights to the MCR position in S&WE under the terms of Rule 32(a).
Because the Organization failed to establish the Claimant's right to the MCR position under either Agreement Rule, the claim must fail. Form 1 Award No. 35188