Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 35400
Docket No. CL-36255
01-3-00-3-484

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Rodney E. Dennis when award was rendered.

(Transportation Communications International Union PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:












Form 1 Award No. 35400
Page 2 Docket No. CL-36255
01-3-00-3-484
H. Crawford 04-07-82
J. Giblin 02-25-86
E. Thrum 06-22-87
R. Eddins 09-08-87
J. Tsang 04-18-88
I. Hughes 05-10-89
P. Tan 11-29-89
B. Bakrow 01-23-90
E. Reid 02-08-93
W. Connell 08-23-93
D. Stevens 02-01-94
K. Woods 01-21-97
B. Boykin 01-30-97
M. Ouelette 10-06-97
M. Whalen 02-26-98
J. Wemmitt 06-OS-98
L. Kinton 07-06-98
P. Angelo 10-27-98"

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.



On November 25 and November 29, during the 1998 Thanksgiving holiday season, the Carrier used Management personnel and other Transportation and Communication Union employees to validate tickets at South Station, Boston, Massachusetts. These employees worked from 7:00 A.M. to 7:00 P.M. both days.
Form 1 Award No. 35400
Page 3 Docket No. CL-36255
01-3-00-3-484

These two days in November, the Wednesday before and the Sunday after Thanksgiving, are the Carrier's busiest days of the year. The Carrier states that the employees were used for crowd control; their main mission was to make sure that passengers, under the crowded conditions boarded the proper trains. The Organization contends that this work is work belonging to Ticket Clerks in Boston and that the employees listed in the Statement of Claim should have been called to work on the days in question. The Organization frames the issue in this case as a violation of Rule 1 Scope, paragraph (e), of the current Agreement.


The Board reviewed the record and finds that this is not the first time the same or similar claims have been filed by the Organization. On all occasions in the past, the claims have been denied on the property or, if progressed to the Board, by the Board. The Board reviewed an identical claim submitted by the same parties covering the same location including many of the same Claimants. It denied the claims, rendering a well reasoned and detailed decision. The Board sees no reason, based on the record before it, not to adopt in this case the reasoning and decision rendered in Third Division Award 34073.








This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.


                        NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of Third Division


                        Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 26th day of April, 2001.