(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
The instant claim alleges that on September 15 through 19, 1997 and September 22 through 26, 1997, the Carrier contracted out work with the City of Weimar, Texas. The claim contends that the City used a 14-Yard Dump Truck "to load dirt while cleaning the right of way in the vicinity of Weimar TX and moved the crossing material to install in the crossings on the main line track, in the vicinity of Weimar TX., mile post 99.09." The Organization alleges dual violations of Rule 1, the Scope Rule of the Agreement, and of the notice requirements of Article 36, as augmented by the Berge/Hopkins letter of December 11, 1981.
Careful review of the record shows that there is a disputed issue of material fact. The Organization contends that outside employees performed work in connection with the installation of main line crossings. The Carrier specifically denied that such work took place. The Carrier's denial was corroborated by F. Parks, City Manager of the City of Weimar, Texas, who provided a detailed explanation of the work that was performed, the reasons it was performed, and how it was performed. With respect to the particular installation work alleged by the Organization to have been performed, Parks wrote: "City trucks or city workers were not used to transport any new crossing or other railroad material."
Given this factual impasse, it is clear that the record presents irreconcilable disputes of fact which are central to the disposition of the claim. Because the Organization, as the moving party in this dispute, failed to meet its evidentiary burden Form 1 Award No. 35855