Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 36227
Docket No. MW-35832
02-3-99-3-828
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
Herbert L. Marx, Jr. when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Soo Line Railroad Company (former Chicago, Milwaukee
( St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when the Carrier assigned outside
forces (Phillips Asphalt Paving, Inc.) to perform Roadway
Equipment and Machine Sub-department work (remove gravel,
level and spread new stone) at Burnham Bridge switch lead in
Milwaukee, Wisconsin on July 20, 1997 (System File C-31-97C080-06/8-00228-016 CMP).
(2) The Agreement was further violated when the Carrier failed to
furnish the General Chairman with advance written notice of its
intent to contract said work as required by Rule 1 and failed to
enter good-faith discussions to reduce the use of contractors and
increase the use of Maintenance of Way forces as set forth in
Appendix I.
(3) As a consequence of the violations referred to in Parts (1) and/or
(2) above, Mr. T. D. Watson shall be compensated 'for twenty-one
hours at the applicable time and one-half (1-1/2) rate of pay . . . ."'
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
Form 1 Award No. 36227
Page 2 Docket No. MW-35832
02-3-99-3-828
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21,1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved
herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
Except as to particular circumstances of contracting of work by the Carrier, this
dispute is identical to that reviewed in Third Division Award 36225, and the Board
reaches the same conclusion.
As to the appropriateness of a monetary remedy for a claimant already under
pay, this, too, has been supported by innumerable Awards in the face of a clear Rule
violation. Following the reasoning in Third Division Award 35378, however, the
appropriate rate of pay is at straight time rather than at the claimed time and one-half.
AWARD
Claim sustained in accordance with the Findings.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders
that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) be made. The Carrier is ordered to make
the Award effective on or before 30 days following the postmark date the Award is
transmitted to the parties.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 24th day of September 2002.