Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 36363
Docket No. SG-36289
03-3-00-3-516
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
Nancy F. Eischen when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CSX Transportation, Inc. (former Louisville and
( Nashville Railroad)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
"Claim on behalf of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on the CSX Transportation Co. (formerly Louisville
& Nashville Railroad):
Claim on behalf of C. T. Brasher, R. D. Haynes, M. R. Anderson, M. D.
Grubbs, J. S. Higgins, J. P. Montgomery, J. V. Higgins, B. K. Watson, J.
C. Groves, C. D. Baggett, R. M. Schocklee, C. A. Rogers, B. Cundiff, Jr.,
D. R. Clary, E. L. McDowell, J. E. Wade, D. A. Chinn and K. A. Messick,
for payment of $1,505.82 each, account Carrier violated the current
Signalmen's Agreement, particularly Rules 51, 31, and 32, when
beginning on August 28, 1999, and continuing through September 17,
1999, it allowed employees assigned to System Signal Gang Numbers 7X44
to perform work not covered under Rule 51, on Seniority District No. 7,
and deprived the Claimants of the opportunity to perform this work.
Carrier also violated Rule 54 of the current Agreement when the
designated Carrier Officer failed to respond to the initial claim in a timely
fashion. Carrier's File No. 15 (00-0003). General Chairman's File No. 9971-11. BRS File Case No. 114
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
Form 1 Award No. 36363
Page 2 Docket No. SG-36289
03-3-00-3-516
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved
herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
Except for the dates of alleged violations, the Claimants, operative facts, contract
language and positions of the Parties in this case are indistinguishable from those in
companion Docket SG-36288, which the Board denied in Third Division Award 36204.
For the reasons set forth with particularity in that Award, this duplicate claim likewise
is denied.
AWARD
Claim denied.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders
that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of January 2003.