Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 36386
Docket No. CL-36954
03-3-01-3-575

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Rodney E. Dennis when award was rendered.

(Transportation Communications International Union PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:














Form 1 Award No. 36386
Page 2 Docket No. CL-36954
03-3-01-3-575
On April 4, 2000 the Carrier allowed, permitted, and required, C.
Lenear, Roster No. 1149, Position No. EX-401, to work a position
as a First Class Lounge Attendant in the Customer Service
Department at 30th Street Station, Philadelphia, PA, from 1:30
P.M. to 10:00 P.M.
The Carrier failed to call and use R Funk, Roster No. 707, Position
No. SFCL-2, who was senior, qualified, and available to work.
Claim is filed in behalf of R Funk for 8 hours pay at the overtime
rate for April 4, 2000 as a penalty when the Carrier violated the
above-mentioned agreement.
Claim is filed in accordance with Rule 7-B-1, is in order, and
should be allowed.






FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
Form 1 Award No. 36386
Page 3 Docket No. CL-36954
03-3-01-3-575

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has j urisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




Claimant R. Funk, as the instant claims so state, is a regularly assigned First Class Lounge Attendant in the Customer Service Department at the 30th Street Station in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. On three occasions, vacancies occurred in the Lounge. The Carrier assigned a Clerk from the Extra Board that covers the Ticket Office area and Lounge in the 30th Street Station at the straight time rate. The position that was filled was a partially excepted position. The Carrier concluded that it had authority to fill the position with a qualified employee from the extra list. The Extra Board Clerk used to fill the three vacancies was on that list.


The Organization presented a number of arguments to support its position: It has not, however, explained how the Carrier's actions in this situation have violated any Article of the current Agreement. It is the Organization's obligation to support its claim with specific Rule violations. It has not done so in this instance.








This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.


                        NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of Third Division


                        Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 18th day of February 2003.