Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 36392
Docket No. CL-36317
03-3-00-3-641

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Dana Edward Eischen when award was rendered.

(Transportation Communications International Union PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:

















Form 1 Award No. 36392
Page 2 Docket No. CL-36317
03-3-00-3-641
3) Attached Exhibit "C" printed list of employees
printed on July 8, 1999, that Joan Kirschner was
performing all WFIS payroll/ time-keeping and
related functions for since at least January 6, 1998,
when she was assigned to do so for the NS Transition
Team. Prior to January 6,1998, she performed WFIS
time-keeping functions for many of these employees
and for some employees that other secretaries were
assigned to perform the WFIS timekeeping functions
for on January 1, 1998.















FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
Form 1 Award No. 36392
Page 3 Docket No. CL-36317
03-3-00-3-641

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934_


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




Pursuant to the November 2,1998 Implementing Agreement, in December 1998 the Carrier ran a "rundown" for employees of Seniority District 26 to select positions in anticipation of the Conrail, NS, CSX merger. Because Claimant Kirschner elected not to select a position she was placed on the Supplemental Extra Board and assigned to Position 09-009-2194-0064-7 for payroll purposes. Following the split date of June 1, 1999, the Claimant was furloughed on July 14, 1999 with no seniority rights. The instant claim was filed on August 4, 1999, alleging that the payroll work the Claimant had performed between January and June 1999 was now being performed by nonAgreement individuals.


The Carrier initially denied the claim by letter of September 16, 1999, reading in pertinent part as follows:

















Form 1 Award No. 36392
Page 4 Docket No. CL-36317
03-3-00-3-641
and only one (1) hour per day for Tuesday through Friday for
input. There is no basis for your claim for eight hours pay.



Careful examination of the record in this case reveals that the Organization never refuted the facts set forth in the Carrier's denial letter, supra. As the moving party in this contract interpretation case, the Organization failed to carry its burden of making out a prima facie case of violation.







This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.

                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 18th day of February 2003.