Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 36974
Docket No. CL-37674
04-3-03-3-27
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee John
B. LaRocco when award was rendered.
(Transportation Communications International Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Kansas City Southern Railroad
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
:
"Claim of the System Committee of the System Committee (GIr12955)
that:
1. Carrier violated Rule 23 (s) (2) and other rules of the Agreement
between KCS and TCU on October 25, 1999, when it blanked a
job on this date and added the duties of this job to the assigned
position of Ms. Angela Dison. Ms. Dison was not compensated for
these additional duties in accordance with the Agreement.
2. Carrier shall now compensate Ms. Dison for 4 hours pay at the
pro rata rate for performing these additional duties. The job pays
$137.22 per day."
FINDINGS
:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are
respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
approved June 21,1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved
'herein.
Form 1 Award No. 36974
Page 2 Docket No. CL-37674
04-3-03-3-27
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
On December 13, 1999, the Organization claimed that the Carrier violated Rule
23(s)(2) of the applicable Agreement on October 25, 1999. It alleged that when the
Claimant reported for duty on October 25, 1999 the Manager assigned the Claimant to
perform the work of Position No. 36 (the AEI desk) in addition to the duties of her
regular Position No. 83 (the Industry DGNO desk). The Organization further alleged
that the Claimant divided her time equally between the two jobs.
The Carrier argued that the Claimant's position title is Customer Service
Representative and the Shreveport Customer Service Center is the Claimant's assigned
work location. The Carrier, therefore, concluded that the Claimant did not change her
assigned work location. The Carrier elaborated that Rule 23(s)(2) was inapplicable to
the Claimant because she was not away from her assigned work location. The Carrier
alternatively argued that it could properly blank Position No. 36 and assign another
employee to accomplish the duties of the blanked position inasmuch as the incumbent
was taking Sick Leave pursuant to Rule 47.
Rule 23(s)(1) and Rule 23(s)(2) of the applicable Agreement provide:
"When it is necessary to blank a position covered by the Scope Rule,
the following will apply:
1) Carrier may blank a position provided the duties of the position
are also blanked or the employe is receiving compensation as
provided by Rule 47, however in the event Carrier finds it
necessary for other employes not covered by BRAC Agreement to
copy train orders, message of record including track car lineups,
or to transmit a message of record at that Station during the
assigned hours of the blanked position, then the Extra Board
employe that would have worked had the position not been
blanked, or if no Extra Board employe is available, then the
senior idle regularly assigned qualified employe who has copying
train orders as a part of his assignment at the nearest location will
be compensated 3 hours at the pro rata rate of the blanked
position for each occurrence. If the above referred to occurrence
takes place outside of the regular assigned hours of the blanked
Form I Award No. 36974
Page 3 Docket No. CL-37674
04-3-03-3-27
position, then the above designated employe shall be paid a
minimum of 3 hours at the pro rata rate for each occurrence.
(2) In the event that any of the assigned duties of the blanked
position, other than those specified in (1), are performed the
Extra Board employe that would have worked had the position
not been blanked will be compensated 8 hours at the pro rata
rate. If no Extra Board employe is available and the work is
performed by an employe covered by this Agreement, then that
employe shall be compensated additional pro rata allowance for
actual time away from his assigned work location, however, if the
assigned duties of the blanked position are performed by an
employe not covered by this Agreement, then the senior qualified
employe at the nearest location will receive an additional 8 hours
at the pro rata rate. It is understood that all payments specified
above will be in addition to any other payments the employe may
be entitled to on that date. It is further understood and agreed
that the above payment will be automatic to the employe entitled
to receive same and that copy of notice of payment will be
furnished to the Division Chairman and General Chairman in
addition to the employe.
NOTE (1) Definition of each occurrence as it appears above is:
For every train order copied, every message of record including track
and/or motor car lineup copied and for message of record transmitted,
or switch list or interchange report prepared, a separate penalty will
be allowed except that it is agreed that no more than one 8 hour or 3
hour payment, whichever applies, will be allowed any one individual if
more than one occurrence occurs at the blanked location during a
consecutive two (2) hour period.
NOTE (2) At locations other than an Extra Board Headquarters point
if no Extra Board employe is available and it is necessary that part of
the duties of the blanked position be performed, Carrier may use an
employe from an adjacent station to perform those duties. If an on
duty employe is used, that employe shall receive compensation for
mileage traveled and shall receive the additional allowance on the
Form 1 Award No. 36974
Page 4 Docket No. CL-37674
04-3-03-3-27
minute basis at the pro rata rate of the position worked or his position,
whichever be the higher."
Rule 47(2) entitled,
Sick Leave of the applicable Agreement reads:
"(2) It will be optional with the Company to fill, partially fill or blank
the position of an employe who is absent account bona tide
sickness. If the Carrier elects to fill the position in its entirety,
appropriate rules of the Agreement will be followed. The use of
other employes on duty and on other positions to perform (during
their regular assigned hours or on overtime) a portion of the
duties of the employe absent under this Rule 47, is permissible. It
is understood that in the application of this Rule 47(2) the
provisions of Rule 40 of the current schedule agreement and
Article VI of the National Agreement dated February 25, 1971,
will be followed.
NOTE: Solely for clarification of this Rule 47(2) `other employes' is
defined as those clerical employes assigned to other positions and on
duty at any work location at the point where the vacancy occurs."
Rule 47(2) clearly and unambiguously states that when an employee is absent
due to sickness, the Carrier has the option to fill, partially fill, or blank the position of
the absent employee. Rule 23(s)(1) grants the Carrier the discretion to blank a position
when an employee is receiving compensation per Rule 47. More importantly, Rules
23(s)(1) and 23(s)(2) have an exception that renders Rule 23(s) harmonious with Rule
47. Subsection two of Rule 23(s) generally provides that an employee who performs the
assigned duties of a blanked position is entitled to an additional allowance. The
exception arises if the incumbent of the blanked position is being compensated with
Rule 47 sick leave. Concomitantly, Rule 23(s)(2) is inapplicable if the assigned duties of
the blanked position are worked while the incumbent is receiving sick leave
compensation as ". . . specified in (1)." Stated differently, if the incumbent of the
blanked position is off work due to sickness and receiving compensation under Rule 47,
the Carrier is exempt from paying the additional compensation provided by Rule
23(s)(2) to the employee who performs some or all of the duties of the blanked position.
Close examination of the evidence exchanged on the property demonstrates that
the parties reasonably presumed that the incumbent of Position No. 36 was receiving
Form 1 Award No. 36974
Page 5 Docket No. CL-37674
04-3-03-3-27
sick pay pursuant to Rule 47. In its Submission to the Board, the Organization noted
that the employee marking off sick did not claim compensation pursuant to Rule 47.
No evidence was presented on the property to substantiate the Organization's assertion
in its Submission. Thus, the Board cannot consider the Organization's factual assertion
that the incumbent did not receive sick leave, because it raised the assertion for the first
time in its Submission.
Therefore, in accordance with our analysis and application of Rules 47(2)
23(s)(1) and 23(s)(2) the Carrier was not required to pay the Claimant with additional
compensation for performing the duties of Position No. 36 as well as performing the
duties of her regularly assigned position.
AWARD
Claim denied.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that
an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of April 2004.