Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 37073
Docket No. CL-37787
04-3-03-3-85
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
Rodney E. Dennis when award was rendered.
(Transportation Communications International Union
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
:
"Claim of the System Committee of the Organization (GL-12966) that:
(a) The Carrier violated the Agreement between the National
Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) and its Employees
represented by Transportation Communications International
Union (TCU) dated July 27, 1976 as amended and revised as of
June 1, 1998.
(b) Specifically, 4-A-6; 8-C-1 and other rules. The Amtrak On-Board
and Stations Services Safety Rules (NRPC 1906) specifically Rule
2040 General Cleanliness and Rule 2042 Floors.
(c) This claim is filed on behalf of G. Binford-Mebane, Martha
Buford, Antoinette Carmichael, Michael Currington, Richard
Heck, Leonard Laurino, Sharon McGlashan, Cariton Nash, John
Ritoh, Guy Rogers, Andrea Vibbet, Jacquelyn Whitehead, Carol
Wiggins, Dorothy Yates, Kamaal Clarke, Vincent Gould,
Cassandra Hyppolite, April Paul, Timothy Scott, Norita TatumSealey, Julia Varela, James Venezia, Brenda Walker, Kimberley
Williams, Gail Binford-Mebane, Ernest Bolden, Danie Carroll,
Efrain Centeno, Edward Fancher, Kevin Fish, Joseph Graf,
Kelvin McLean, Louis Mistretta, David Morgan, Kevin Murphy,
John Pagnotta, George Showe, Steve Williams, Tim Darnell and
others for the date(s) May 30, 2001 and continuing. Claimant(s)
are employed at Newark Penn Station. The Carrier's Safety
Form 1 Award No. 37073
Page 2 Docket No. CL-37787
04-3-03-3-85
Engineer, in a letter dated May 30, 2001 references asbestos
material on a drain pipe, a leaking drain pipe, wet wires,
electrical hazards, bucket(s) of water, wires from the ceiling, all of
which are in the Customer Service Office; water on the concrete
floor and slip hazards in the men/women's locker room. As of the
wiring of this letter, the unsafe conditions have not been resolved
to the satisfaction of the above-mentioned employee(s) or their
designated Union Representatives.
(d) Claimant(s) G. Binford-Mebane, et al now be allowed three (3)
hours' pay at the pro-rata rate which hourly rates in $18.46 for
May 30, 2001 and for continuing days as long as the unsafe
conditions are allowed to exist. The Carrier's Safety Engineer
invites Mr. Louis Murphy (OSHA) and Mr. Russell Oathout
(TCU) or their representatives to walk the property to ensure
unsafe conditions are resolved for all parties. The Carrier will
provide health exams for all employees who believe their health
has been affected due to standing water which breeds mosquitoes,
employees with lung, eye or skin irritations due to wet rugs which
cause mold and mildew. The Carrier will build a floor in the
men/women's Locker Room to completely drain the water on the
concrete floor during high tide.
(e) This claim is flied in accordance with Rule 25 of the Off-Corridor
Agreement, Rule 7-B-1 of the NEC Agreement and should be
allowed.
(f) Claim is further made that Carrier violated the provisions of
Rules 25 and 7-B-1 relating to time limit."
FINDINGS
:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that: .
Form 1 Award No. 37073
Page 3 Docket No. CIr37787
04-3-03-3-85
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are
respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved
herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
The instant claim involves allegations of unsafe working conditions at Penn
Station in Newark, New Jersey. The Organization filed the above-stated claim listing
the Claimants and its demand for payment and other benefits that should be granted to
them. The claim contains allegations from both parties concerning time limit violations
and the propriety of monetary payments to the Claimants.
The Board discussed this case in great detail. As a result of those discussions, the
partisan members of the Board have agreed to return this dispute to the local level for
discussion and resolution. Therefore, the Board concluded that this case has been
remanded for a party decision.
AWARD
Claim remanded to the parties for resolution.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that
an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of July 2004.