Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 37186
Docket No. SG-37997
04-3-03-3-431
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
Martin H, Malin when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM
:
"Claim on behalf of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of
Railroad Signalmen on the National Railroad Passenger Corp.
(Amtrak):
Claim on behalf of R L. Duckett, for Carrier to inform the
Organization of its actions taken to rectify the harassment of the
Claimant and the hopeful prevention of inappropriate harassment of
the membership, account Carrier violated the Signalmen's
Agreement, particularly Rule 58 (UNJUST TREATMENT) when on
June 19, 2002, Carrier's Supervisor inappropriately accused the
Claimant of sleeping in a company vehicle while on duty. It was
determined that insufficient evidence was provided by the
Supervisor to support his accusation. Carrier's action toward the
Claimant was unjust treatment. Carrier's File No. NEC-BRS(S)SD-978. General Chairman's File No. JY32101015-180210. BRS
File Case No. 12750-NRPC(S).11
FINDINGS
:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
Form 1 Award No. 37186
Page 2 Docket No. SG-37997
04-3-03-3-431
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
On June 19, 2002, the Claimant's Supervisor allegedly observed the Claimant
sleeping in a Carrier vehicle and reported the observation to the Assistant Division
Engineer. The Assistant Division Engineer interviewed the Supervisor, the
Claimant and other employees in the area and concluded that there was insufficient
evidence that the Claimant was sleeping. No disciplinary charges were brought
against the Claimant. The Claimant's record is clear and he was never subjected to
formal disciplinary charges. Therefore, there was no unjust treatment under the
Agreement.
AWARD
Claim denied.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders
that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of September 2004.