Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 37209
Docket No. SG-37816
04-3-03-3-185

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Robert Perkovich when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM :



FINDINGS :

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
Form 1 Award No. 37209
Page 2 Docket No. SG-37816
04-3-03-3-185



At all relevant times herein the Claimant was employed by the Carrier as a Signal Maintainer responsible for the maintenance of switches at the East and West Charleston location of the Carrier. On January 20, 2002 the Carrier assigned a BMWE-represented employee to remove snow and ice from switches that did not respond to power operated switching devices. The record reflects that the BMWErepresented employee was already in the yard cleaning snow and ice from switches generally and in doing so was assigned to attend to the switches in question as well as others.


The Organization contends that when removing snow and ice or other foreign matter from switches is done for the purpose of ensuring the proper operation of signals, that work accrues to employees represented by the Organization. Under circumstances different from that of the instant case, we might find ourselves in agreement with the Organization. However, the record clearly reflects that the work in question in this case did not become necessary because snow and ice on the switches caused a malfunction, but rather only because the BMWE-represented employee was already in the yard performing such work on switches generally. Thus, we believe that this case can be distinguished from that where a power failure had occurred and find that the claim is without merit.








This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.


                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 28th day of September 2004.