For TI L ADJUSTMENT DIVISION




The Third Division consisted of the regular embers and in addition Referee Robert . Richter when award s rendered.

    (Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen TIES T DISPUTE:

                  (Union Pacific Railroad Cany


STATEMENT F CLAIM:
      "Claim n behalf t General Committee t Brotherhood ailroa Signalmen on t Union Pacific (UP).


          Clai n behalf . . o ell, . F. Lester, T. . Miller n . univin, for .5 hours at their respective time n one-half rates

      pay, account Carrier violated the current Signalmen's Agreement,

      articularly the clan 1, when it allowed lys

      not covered y t Signalmen's s Agreement to transport and install a

      signal service pole e at Alford, Oregon, M.P. 667.0, on September 25,

        1, n deprived t Claimants the opportunity t err this

      work. Carrier's s File No. 1293205. General Chairman's File No. W-

        -147. BRS File Case .7 -U."


    I


e Tit Division of e Adjustment Board, upon the of recor an all t evidence, finds that:

 The carrier r carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute, re respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,, s approved 21,1 .

 This, Division of. the Adjustment Board. has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
 For 1 Page

 r . 7611
 Docket . 76
 ®770

      arties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.


      s Third Par in Interest, the Brotherhood of Maintenance y

ploys advise of the pendency of this dispute and chose to file a Submission with te or.

    At the time the dispute arose, the Claimants ere members of Signal an

o. 046.

        September , 2001 the Carrier's track employees were working at

Alford, on, hen they accidentally knocked down an electrical l pole, which they
 proceeded t .
 n November , 001 t Organization file a claim asserting violation the Scope Rule.

 The Carrier maintained tht the pole was an electrical pole, not a signal pole,. T Organization i not refute the Carrier's position. Ergo, the work is not covered t Scope ul.

 AWARD
Claim denied.

 I ORDER
      This Board, after consideration of the dispute

t n r favorable Ci ants) ) not be made.

 identified above, hereby orders

 TI L S
 By Order of Third Division

 Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this ay September .