Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 37712
Docket No. SG-37903
06-3-03-3-321

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Marty E. Zusman when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:



FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
Form 1 Award No. 37712
Page 2 Docket No. SG-37903
06-3-03-3-321

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




By letter dated May 14, 2002, the Organization fled claim alleging that the Carrier violated Rule 58. It argued that the Claimant was headquartered at Port Allen, Louisiana, and was required to report to his new headquarters point at Blue Springs, Missouri. The claim alleges failure of the Carrier to properly pay the Claimant for the travel time and mileage.


As in Third Division Award 37713, the Organization maintains that the distance between the two points, or 885 miles, with 16 hours travel time is to be compensated under Rule 58. The Carrier argues that the Claimant was released from duty at Port Allen, Louisiana, on March 28 and required to mark up the following Monday, April 1, 2002 at Blue Springs, Missouri. The Carrier denied the claim on the property because the Claimant would have traveled 755 miles to return to Port Allen from his residence in Peculiar, Missouri, but only 33 miles from his residence to get to his new headquarters point of Blue Springs, Missouri. Because the distance to the new headquarters point is less than the distance to the old headquarters point, no transportation allowance is due.


As we have previously stated, the Organization's arguments for contending that the Claimant's residence is irrelevant lack probative evidence. There is, as has been the case in prior Awards, no proof that the distance between points has ever been the proper interpretation of Rule 58(b). Nor has the Organization provided in this record any evidence to prove that the Carrier's actions were new, unusual, or that its application of the Rule was previously challenged. The only Award the Board has on this issue supports our view that no mileage reimbursement is due, that this claim is without merit, and that the claim must be denied (Third Division Award 37551).

Form 1 Award No. 37712
Page 3 Docket No. SG-37903
06-3-03-3-321







This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.

                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of January 2006.