Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 37806
Docket No. CL-38121
06-3-03-3-508

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Martin H. Malin when award was rendered.

(Transportation Communication International Union PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:






Form 1 Award No. 37806
Page 2 Docket No. CI-38121





Form 1 Award No. 37806
Page 3 Docket No. C1-38121
06-3-03-3-508
and on a conference with Vice General Oathout of TCU that no such
call sheets existed and that the Organization should file a claim for
all of the dates. S. Martin-Jordon would be working the whole week
because she was not going to change her mind in order for
unnecessary claims/grievances to be filed.
This claim has been filed in accordance with Rule 7-B-1 of the NEC
Agreement and in accordance with the Off-Corridor Clerks Rules
Agreement, Rule 25, and should be allowed and accepted as
presented."

FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:


The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.


This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




The instant claim alleges that on June 17, 2002, the Carrier worked a Guaranteed Extra Board employee for ten hours at Newark - Penn Station in violation of the Agreement which provides that the regular workweek consists of five eight hour days. The Organization maintains that the Carrier may only require employees to work ten hour days at Newark Airport where the parties have a Special Agreement to that effect. The Carrier responds that it has the right under the Agreement to work an Extra Board employee for ten hours where necessary to meet the employee's 40 hour weekly guarantee.

Form 1 Award No. 37806
Page 4 Docket No. C1-38121


We need not determine which party's interpretation of the Agreement is accurate. The record reveals that there is a disputed issue of fact. During handling on the property, the Organization based its position that the Extra Board employee worked ten hours on the date in question on the work schedule. The Carrier, pointing to the History of Paid Labor, maintained that the Extra Board employee worked only eight hours on the date in question. Notably absent was any statement from the employee attesting to the hours that she actually worked.


As an appellate body, we are unable to resolve such disputed issues of fact. The Organization bears the burden of proof on the question of how many hours the Extra Board employee worked. On the record presented, the claim must fail for lack of proof.


                          AWARD


      Claim denied.


                          ORDER


This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.


                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of June 2006.