Form I NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 37860
Docket No. SG-37685
06-3-02-3-780

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Robert Richter when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:












FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.
Form i Award No. 3 7860
Page 2 Docket No. SG-37685
06-3-02-3-780

This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




On November 20, 2001 the Organization submitted the instant claim. The claim alleged that Rule 32 permitted the Claimant to exercise displacement rights because, ". . . claimant was notified by his manager that there was a change in tool house/headquarters and of a significant material change in territory." In addition to Rule 32, the claim cited Rules 56, 58, 64, and 80 of the Agreement. Rule 32 is the only relevant Rule in this case. It reads as follows:









Form i Award No. 37860
Page 3 Docket No. SG-37685
06-3-02-3-780










While the Claimant was off on sick leave, the Carrier changed the territory of his Signal Maintainer's position. The Organization alleges that the headquarters of the assignment also was changed.


Originally the Claimant was assigned the territory from MP 221 east to MP 198.41 with headquarters at Elm Creek, Nebraska. After the change was made the Claimant's territory was from MP 221 west to MP 235.4 with headquarters at Elm Creek.




nh~nd *n T nvinn*nn *hn ('.~rr~nr ~lnnine *hn* oe hninn en T* 6»rniehoel *hn
v.aauaay, av L b., , v m.v.a a , w ..u m n w 6 .no. w .uaaaaoaw ma.
Organization with a copy of the Claimant's work history dated July 15, 2002 that
shows the Claimant headquartered at Elm Creek. The Carrier does admit that it
told the Claimant that he could use the tool house at Lexington, the Claimant's
home town, if he so desired.

It is the Organization's burden to prove that the Agreement has been violated. Under the provisions of Rule 32 there are three ways that changes in Signal Maintainers' jobs may be re-advertised. One, a change in headquarters; two, when a Signal Maintainer's territory is materially increased; and, three, when the starting time is changed by two or more hours.


At first glance one might say that the Claimant's job was materially changed because the Claimant's new work was west of Elm Creek instead of east. However, changes like those in this case are not specified in the Rule to require the job to be re-advertised.

Form i Award No. 37860
Page 4 Docket No. SG-37685
06-3-02-3-780

The record is clear. The Claimant's headquarters was not changed, the mileage of the territory was not materially increased, nor was the starting time changed. Thus, the Organization failed to prove that the Agreement was violated.






This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.



                      By Order of Third Division


" Da4eA at Chicago, 1111"nols, thi- I - I - I I I --- I
L U t ILIJIJ I II tills Ist Clay 01 August /.UUO.