Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 38096
Docket No. SG-37818
07-3-03-3-188

The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Elizabeth C. Wesman when award was rendered.

(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM:



FINDINGS:

The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:

The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934.
Form 1 Award No. 38096
Page 2 Docket No. SG-37818



This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.




At issue in this dispute is Rule 16 - Subject to Call - of the Agreement between the parties. That Rule reads, in pertinent part, as follows:



On the date in question, the No. 5 switch located at CP X346 Mile Post 345.6 malfunctioned and would not lock in the reverse position. There is no disagreement on the record that the Carrier attempted to call the Claimant to come in for the trouble call, because it was located on his normal territory. The Claimant failed to respond to the call within what the Carrier considered a reasonable amount of time, and the Carrier proceeded to call the next available employee.


The Organization filed a claim in which it contended that, so long as the Claimant responded within two hours of the call, he was legitimately the employee who should have been assigned the work at issue. It based its claim on its interpretation of Rule 16. However, as can be seen above, the only reference to two hours is with regard to an employee expecting to be away from his usual "point of call" for that amount of time. Nothing in that Rule mandates that the Carrier must wait two hours for a response from the employee first called before proceeding to call the next eligible employee. The record in this case confirms that the Carrier made a good faith effort to call the Claimant, and, getting no response, waited a

Form 1 Award No. 38096
Page 3 Docket No. SG-37818


reasonable amount of time before proceeding to the next eligible employee. There is no showing on this record that the Carrier "rushed to judgment" in calling the employee ultimately assigned to perform the work in question. Accordingly the instant claim is denied in its entirety.


                        AWARD


      Claim denied.


                        ORDER


This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.


                      NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                      By Order of Third Division


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of February 2007.