Form 1 NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 38148
n._.oor
N_
n/rca~
27,e~7
aW .aW ..1·V.1·1··-JlTl4
07-3-02-3-562
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
Elizabeth C. W esman when award was rendered.
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(CP Rail System (former Delaware and Hudson
( Railway Company)
RTATFMFN
T CIF CLAIM-
"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) Tile Agreement was violated when the Carrier assigned outside
forces to perform Maintenance of Way work (operate
equipment for excavating and grading) in preparation of
installing a running track at the Howard's Siding Project in the
vicinity of Mile Posts A 123 and A 124 on the Canadian Main
Line beginning on May 11, 2001 and continuing, instead of
assigning said work to system equipment operators (Carrier's
File 8-00200 DHRI.
(2) The Agreement was further violated when the Carrier failed to
furnish the General Chairman with proper advance written
_Le__
_r
11UL11;C Ul
ILJ IlIA.CIILIUll tU
contract out
the
aforesaid worK or
make a good-faith effort
to
reduce the incidence of
subcontracting and increase the use of its Maintenance of Way
forces as required by Rule I and Appendix H.
(3) As a consequence of the violations referred to in Parts (1)
and/or (2) above, the senior furloughed system equipment
operators. euual to the number of contracted
emnlovPC. chall hi -
I - _ . _ ___ y
I A
compensated at their respective rates of pay on an hour for
hour basis for all time worked by the outside forces in the
Form 1 Award No. 38148
Page 2 Docket No. MW-37472
07-3-02-3-562
performance of the aforesaid work beginning May 11, 2001 and
continuing."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
involved herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
This case is essentially identical to the matters decided in Third Division
Awards 38149 and 38151. For reasons set forth in detail in those Awards, the
instant claim is denied.
AWARD
Claim denied.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders
that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 23rd day of April 2007.