Form I
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 39866
Docket No. CL-40456
09-3-NRAB-00003-080326
The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee
Brian Clauss when award was rendered.
PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (
(BNSF Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
(Transportation Communications International Union
"Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-13200) that:
(a) Carrier violated
rules of the current Clerks' Agreement at
Kansas City, Kansas on December 16, 2005, when it required or
permitted employees that are not covered by the rules of the
Agreement to perform routine schedule clerical work; and
(b) The work which was removed from the scope and operation of the
Agreement shall now be restored to the employees covered thereby;
and
(e) Claimant D. W. Simmons, et al, shall now be compensated for eight
(8) hours at the pro rata of their abolished positions for each work
day commencing December 16, 2005 and continuing until such
violation ceases, in addition to any other compensation Claimant
may have received for these days."
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are
respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
approved June 21,1934.
Form 1 Award No. 39866
Page 2 Docket No. CL-40456
09-3-NRAB-00003-080326
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved
herein.
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
The Claimants in this matter transcribed audio cassette recordings of formal
Investigations and meetings throughout the system as part of the Kansas City Word
Processing Group. On December 30, 2005, the Claimants' positions were abolished and
the transcription work was sent to AccuTrans, LLC. In its denial of the claim, the
Carrier noted that transcription work has been performed by various contractors
throughout the system and identified ten of those contractors. The Carrier contends
that the denial is proper because the Organization has not proven that the work in
question (transcription) has been reserved exclusively to TCU-represented employees
on a system-wide basis.
The burden of proof in this matter is on the Organization. After a careful review
of the record before the Board, we do not find that the Organization presented evidence
to contradict the Carrier's assertion regarding the use of outside contractors for
transcriptions. Accordingly, the Organization failed to meet its burden in this matter
and the claim must be denied.
AWARD
Claim denied.
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that
an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of July 2009.