The Third Division consisted of the regular members and in addition Referee Steven M. Bierig when award was rendered.
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21,1934.
This Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
The facts of the instant dispute do not appear to be at issue. The Organization claims that the Carrier unilaterally changed the work days for Gang 8513 without properly abolishing and bulletining the positions as required. Gang 8513 was originally assigned to work Monday through Friday, eight hours per day with Saturday and Sunday as assigned rest days. Pursuant to Rule 40, the members of the Gang voted by majority vote to change their workweek to a compressed workweek of Monday through Thursday, ten hours per day with Friday, Saturday and Sunday as rest days. At some point subsequent to this vote, the members of the Gang voted to again change their workweek. They retained the compressed workweek, but changed the days of the workweek to Sunday through Wednesday, ten hours per day, with Thursday, Friday, and Saturday as rest days. Pursuant to this latest change, the Organization filed the instant claim.
The Organization claims that while it was appropriate for the Gang to change its workweek from Monday through Friday to Monday through Thursday, the Carrier did not have the right to change the work days to Sunday through Wednesday without abolishment and advertisement. As a remedy, the Organization requests that the members of the Gang be paid at the overtime rate for all hours worked on previously designated rest days. Form 1 Award No. 40209
Conversely, the Carrier contends that the burden is on the Organization to prove that there was a violation of the Agreement. It stresses that the members of Gang 8513 voluntarily chose to change their work days and did so by a majority vote. It contends that the language of Rule 40 specifically allows this action and there is no need to abolish or bulletin the positions. It further argues that Third Division Award 39319 specifically rejected the Organization's position. It requests that the claim be denied.
After a review of the record evidence and positions of the parties, the Board agrees with the Carrier that the Organization failed to meet its burden of proof. Based on the language of Rule 40 as well as Third Division Award 39319, the Carrier acted properly when it allowed Gang 8513 to change its workweek from Monday through Thursday to Sunday through Wednesday without abolishment or bulletining the positions. Accordingly, the claim is denied.
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders that an Award favorable to the Claimants) not be made.