Form 1
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Award No. 40383
Docket No. MW-38737
10-3-NRAB-00003-050148
(05-3-148)
The Third Division consisted of the tear members and in addition Referee
Steven IYL Bierig when award was rendered.
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division -
( IBT Rail Conference
(Union Pacific Railroad Company (former Missouri
( Pacific Railroad Company)
"Claims of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) The Agreement was violated when, beginning February 1, 2004
and continuing, the Carrier improperly changed the assigned work
week of B&B Gang 930$ from Monday through Thursday work
days and Friday through Sunday rest days to an alternate work
period of a compressed second half working on the eighth (8th) of
each month through the fifteenth (15th) and again on the twentythird (23rd) through the end of the month with the days between
such compressed work cycles as rest days (System Files MW-04-82/
1393986, T04-11/1395925 and M4-MOP040/1399493 MPR).
(2) As a consequence of the violation referred to in Part (1) above,
Messrs. J. Calais, Jr., M. Woytasczyk, W. Gardner, B. Carter, M.
Wingate, J. McClure and R. Herrea shall now, beginning February
1, 2004 and continuing until they are returned to their aforesaid
assigned work week, each be compensated for two (2) hours at their
respective time and one-half rates of pay for each day beginning on
the eighth (8th) day of each month through the fifteenth (15th) of
each month and each day beginning on the twenty-third (23rd)
through the end of each month and compensated for twelve (12)
Form 1
Page 2
FINDINGS:
Award No. 40383
Docket No. MW-38737
10-3-NRAB-00003-050148
(05-3-148)
hours at their respective time and one-half rates of pay for each
Friday, Saturday and Sunday of each month that they were required
to work."
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the
evidence, finds that:
The carrier or carriers and the employee or employees involved in this dispute
are respectively carrier and employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21,1934.
This Division of
involved herein.
Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute
Parties to said dispute were given due notice of hearing thereon.
The facts of the instant dispute do not appear to be at issue. This case
involves three claims that were filed by three different General Chairmen who are
all signed to the same Collective Bargaining Agreement. Each General Chairman
filed a claim over the same situation.
During the time period of the claim, B&B Gang 930$ was working on the
Lufkin Subdivision along with Tie Gangs 916$ and 9169 under the same 9 hour
curfew or work window. This curfew was provided by the Harriman Dispatch
Center and was intended for maintenance forces to have nine hours of available
work opportunity per work day so that the gangs could perform their services
without having to leave the track so trains could pass. According to the Carrier,
this curfew directly increases production because it provides opportunity to work on
the track.
Management took a vote from a majority of the employees working under the
same work window to determine whether there was agreement to work a
compressed work period. Only Gang 9038 voted to not work a compressed work
Form 1 Award No. 40383
Page 3 Docket No. MW-38737
10-3-NRAB-00003-050148
(05-3-148)
period. The vote was two in favor and five against within Gang 9308. The other
gangs working on the Lufkin Subdivision voted in favor of the alternative work
period and when the votes for all employees working within the same window were
combined, the Carrier contends that a majority voted to change schedules.
The Organization claims that the Carrier violated the Agreement when it
unilaterally changed the days of Gang 9038 even though the members of that Gang
clearly voted against the change to a compressed work schedule. It contends that
Gangs 9168 and 9169 were working on different, unrelated projects and that the
three gangs were not working on the same "window" as defined by Rule 25. Thus,
the Carrier did not have the right to change the schedule of Gang 9038 to a
compressed work schedule. As a remedy, the Organization requests that the
members of Gang 9038 be paid for all lost wages at the applicable rates of pay.
The Carrier stresses that the members of Gang 9038 were working on the
same window as were Gangs 9168 and 9169 and, therefore, the Carrier had the right
to take the combined vote of all three gangs on the question of the compressed
workweek. It is uncontested that the majority vote of the three gangs combined
voted to agree to a compressed workweek.
Rule 25 states in relevant part:
Section 1.
(k)(I)With the election in writing from the majority of the employees
working on a project or within the same window, and with the
concurrence of the appropriate Manager, alternative work
periods may be established to enhance production or rest time
off where operations will permit. Work days and rest days of
an alternative work period will be set forth in writing in
advance of the beginning of the alternative work period
Form 1 Award No. 40383
Page 4 Docket No. MW-38737
10-3-NRAB-00003-050148
(05-3-148)
arrangement and said document will be posted or available at a
convenient location accessible to the employees affected.
At the same time, a copy of the signed election for the agreed to
work schedule will be forwarded to the General Chairmen.
Alternative work periods established pursuant to this rule will
have no less than eight (8) and no more than twelve (12)
straight time work hours per each workday, and all rest days
will be observed consecutively. The work days of the
alternative work period may be scheduled on a non-consecutive
basis so the consecutive rest day period may be observed
during holidays, weekends, special events, etc. In any event, the
number of straight time work hours of the alternative work
period will equal the number of straight time work hours of the
regular work period that the alternative work period replaced.
(2) Rules in effect covering payment for service performed during
hours outside a regular eight-hour assignment will apply to
service performed during hours outside the work periods
established pursuant to this agreement.
(3) Rules in effect for consecutive or compressed work periods
covering the administration of per diem allowances, vacation
and holidays, will continue in effect for alternative work
periods established under this agreement."
After a review of the record evidence and the positions of the parties, the
Board concludes that the Organization has been unable to meet its burden of proof.
Based on the language of Rule 25, the Carrier acted properly when it placed Gang
9038 on a compressed work schedule in spite of the fact that a majority of that gang
had voted against the change. Accordingly, the claim is denied.
AWARD
Claim denied.
Form 1 Award No. 40383
Page 5 Docket No. MW-38737
10-3-NRAB-00003-050148
(05-3-148)
ORDER
This Board, after consideration of the dispute identified above, hereby orders
that an Award favorable to the Claimant(s) not be made.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of March 2010.